Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Los Angeles County Department of Mental HealthLos Angeles County Department of Mental Health
VS
Swiss Federal AdministrationSwiss Federal Administration
Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health

Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health

550 S Vermont Ave, Los Angeles, 90020, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://dmh.lacounty.gov/
642/1000Poor

The Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health (LACDMH) is the largest county mental health department in the country. LACDMH directly operates 75 program sites and more than 100 co-located sites. Additionally, LACDMH contracts with approximately 1,000 providers, in...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:2,127
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1
Swiss Federal Administration

Swiss Federal Administration

Eigerstrasse 71, Bern, 3003, CH

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.stelle.admin.ch
786/1000Fair

Seven departments, the Federal Chancellery and around 70 administrative units make up the Federal Administration. With around 38,000 employees, we are one of the largest employers in Switzerland. Everyone who works for the Federal Administration actively contributes t...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:24,156
Subsidiaries:68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health

Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Swiss Federal Administration

Swiss Federal Administration

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swiss Federal Administration in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Swiss Federal Administration (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swiss Federal Administration cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health

Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LAC313072725
🔒 Incident : Breach
LAC215072625
🔒 Incident : Breach
LAC254072825
Swiss Federal Administration

Swiss Federal Administration

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health company and Swiss Federal Administration company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health company and Swiss Federal Administration company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health company and Swiss Federal Administration company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health company and Swiss Federal Administration company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health company and Swiss Federal Administration company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health company and Swiss Federal Administration company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health company and Swiss Federal Administration company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health company and Swiss Federal Administration company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health company and Swiss Federal Administration company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health company and Swiss Federal Administration company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health company and Swiss Federal Administration company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health and Swiss Federal Administration, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health and Swiss Federal Administration, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health or Swiss Federal Administration ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health or Swiss Federal Administration ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health and Swiss Federal Administration, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health and Swiss Federal Administration, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA