Comparison Overview
L.A. Care Health Plan
L.A. Care Health Plan
1200 W 7th St, Los Angeles, California, US, 90017
Last Update: 01/04/2026
L.A. Care’s mission is to provide access to quality health care for L.A. County’s low-income communities, and to support the safety net required to achieve that purpose. As a publicly operated health plan, L.A. Care Health Plan serves more than 2.6 million members in Lo...
Mass General Brigham
399 Revolution Dr, Somerville, 02145, US
Last Update: 03/09/2026
Mass General Brigham is an integrated academic health care system, uniting great minds to solve the hardest problems in medicine for our communities and the world. Mass General Brigham connects a full continuum of care across a system of academic medical centers, commun...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
L.A. Care Health Plan
Mass General Brigham
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for L.A. Care Health Plan in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Mass General Brigham in 2026.
Incident History - L.A. Care Health Plan (X = Date, Y = Severity)
L.A. Care Health Plan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Mass General Brigham (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mass General Brigham cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
L.A. Care Health Plan
Mass General Brigham
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.