Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

L.A. Care Health PlanL.A. Care Health Plan
VS
Aster DM HealthcareAster DM Healthcare
L.A. Care Health Plan

L.A. Care Health Plan

1200 W 7th St, Los Angeles, California, US, 90017

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.lacare.org
748/1000Moderate

L.A. Care’s mission is to provide access to quality health care for L.A. County’s low-income communities, and to support the safety net required to achieve that purpose. As a publicly operated health plan, L.A. Care Health Plan serves more than 2.6 million members in Lo...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:1,974
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1
Aster DM Healthcare

Aster DM Healthcare

AE

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
798/1000Fair

From a single medical centre to a performance-driven healthcare enterprise spread across more than 400+ medical establishments, including 15 hospitals, 120 clinics and 307 pharmacies in GCC and growing, Aster DM Healthcare has transitioned into being the leading healthc...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:18,904
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
L.A. Care Health Plan

L.A. Care Health Plan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Aster DM Healthcare

Aster DM Healthcare

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L.A. Care Health Plan in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aster DM Healthcare in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - L.A. Care Health Plan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L.A. Care Health Plan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Aster DM Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aster DM Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
L.A. Care Health Plan

L.A. Care Health Plan

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LAC1003091725
🔒 Incident : Breach
LAC205072925
🔒 Incident : Breach
LAC424080425
Aster DM Healthcare

Aster DM Healthcare

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between L.A. Care Health Plan company and Aster DM Healthcare company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between L.A. Care Health Plan company and Aster DM Healthcare company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between L.A. Care Health Plan company and Aster DM Healthcare company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between L.A. Care Health Plan company and Aster DM Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between L.A. Care Health Plan company and Aster DM Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between L.A. Care Health Plan company and Aster DM Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between L.A. Care Health Plan company and Aster DM Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between L.A. Care Health Plan company and Aster DM Healthcare company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between L.A. Care Health Plan company and Aster DM Healthcare company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between L.A. Care Health Plan company and Aster DM Healthcare company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between L.A. Care Health Plan company and Aster DM Healthcare company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between L.A. Care Health Plan and Aster DM Healthcare, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between L.A. Care Health Plan and Aster DM Healthcare, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - L.A. Care Health Plan or Aster DM Healthcare ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - L.A. Care Health Plan or Aster DM Healthcare ?
Between L.A. Care Health Plan and Aster DM Healthcare, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between L.A. Care Health Plan and Aster DM Healthcare, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1