Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Labour ProgramLabour Program
VS
State of MinnesotaState of Minnesota
Labour Program

Labour Program

Gatineau, CA

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://ow.ly/1jxu30qipd8
761/1000Fair

Welcome to the Labour Program page. The Labour Program is part of the Employment and Social Development Canada portfolio and is responsible for protecting the rights and well-being of both workers and employers in federally regulated workplaces. We work closely with pr...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:60
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
State of Minnesota

State of Minnesota

75 Martin Luther King Jr Blvd, Saint Paul, Minnesota, US, 55155

Last Update: 18/10/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://mn.gov/portal/
787/1000Fair

Minnesota State Government is the third largest employer in the state of Minnesota, employing over 50,000 diverse and talented employees in more than 100 state agencies, boards, commissions, colleges, and universities. Our workplaces can be found across the state in 86 ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:32,539
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Labour Program

Labour Program

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
State of Minnesota

State of Minnesota

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Labour Program in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of Minnesota in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Labour Program (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Labour Program cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - State of Minnesota (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Minnesota cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Labour Program

Labour Program

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
State of Minnesota

State of Minnesota

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Labour Program company and State of Minnesota company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Labour Program company and State of Minnesota company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Labour Program company and State of Minnesota company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Labour Program company and State of Minnesota company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Labour Program company and State of Minnesota company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Labour Program company and State of Minnesota company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Labour Program company and State of Minnesota company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Labour Program company and State of Minnesota company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Labour Program company and State of Minnesota company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Labour Program company and State of Minnesota company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Labour Program company and State of Minnesota company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Labour Program and State of Minnesota, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Labour Program and State of Minnesota, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Labour Program or State of Minnesota ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Labour Program or State of Minnesota ?
Between Labour Program and State of Minnesota, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Labour Program and State of Minnesota, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9