Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LSDH, site de L'ABEILLELSDH, site de L'ABEILLE
VS
Alfa CorporativoAlfa Corporativo
LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE

LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE

9 rue d'Obernai, Cholet, 49300, FR

Last Update: 02/02/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.lsdh.fr
748/1000Moderate

L’ABEILLE est à l’origine une petite entreprise de limonade artisanale créée par M. Uzureau. L’Abeille était le nom de la jument avec laquelle M. Uzureau effectuait ses livraisons. La carriole tirée par cette jument était en effet souvent entourée d’abeilles, attirées p...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:173
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Alfa Corporativo

Alfa Corporativo

Ave. Gómez Morín 1111, San Pedro Garza García, 66254, MX

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.alfa.com.mx
769/1000Fair

Sigma Foods es una empresa multinacional líder en alimentos empacados, con un portafolio de más de 100 marcas y operaciones en 17 países. Atendemos más de 640,000 puntos de venta con el apoyo de 47,000 colaboradores, 64 plantas de producción y 189 centros de distribució...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:27,174
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE

LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Alfa Corporativo

Alfa Corporativo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alfa Corporativo in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Alfa Corporativo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alfa Corporativo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE

LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Alfa Corporativo

Alfa Corporativo

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE company and Alfa Corporativo company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE company and Alfa Corporativo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE company and Alfa Corporativo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE company and Alfa Corporativo company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE company and Alfa Corporativo company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE company and Alfa Corporativo company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE company and Alfa Corporativo company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE company and Alfa Corporativo company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE company and Alfa Corporativo company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE company and Alfa Corporativo company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE company and Alfa Corporativo company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE and Alfa Corporativo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE and Alfa Corporativo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE or Alfa Corporativo ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE or Alfa Corporativo ?
Between LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE and Alfa Corporativo, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LSDH, site de L'ABEILLE and Alfa Corporativo, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63175
SUMMARY

PlaywrightCapture stored capture-specific configuration and runtime data as mutable class-level variables rather than instance-level variables. Consequently, multiple Capture objects running within the same Python process could share state, including HTTP headers, cookies, browser storage, HTTP credentials, proxy configuration, user-agent settings, geolocation information, and captured request data. In a multi-user or concurrent deployment, information supplied during one capture could therefore persist and be reused by a subsequent or parallel capture. This could result in the disclosure of authentication cookies, credentials, browser storage, or captured request data belonging to another user. It could also cause requests to be performed with another capture's authentication context, headers, or proxy configuration, potentially enabling unauthorized access to remote resources or interference with other capture operations. The vulnerability is resolved by initializing all capture-specific settings and request data as instance variables in the Capture constructor, ensuring that state is isolated between capture operations.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-15
UPDATED
Date2026-07-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-62314
SUMMARY

Anubis is a Web AI Firewall Utility that challenges users' connections in order to protect upstream resources from scraper bots. From 1.22.0 until 1.26.0-pre1, lib/policy/checker.go PathChecker.Check() trusted the client-controlled X-Original-URI header before matching r.URL.Path, allowing an HTTP client to match default data/common/keep-internet-working.yaml ALLOW rules such as ^/\.well-known/.*$ and bypass the Anubis challenge. This issue is fixed in version 1.26.0-pre1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-15
UPDATED
Date2026-07-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-55652
SUMMARY

Wekan is open source kanban built with Meteor. Prior to 9.46, header-login with HEADER_LOGIN_TRUSTED_IPS uses getRequestIp() in server/lib/headerLoginAuth.js to trust the client-supplied X-Forwarded-For header before the real socket address, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to send HEADER_LOGIN_ID for any username and receive a meteor_login_token session, including for admin. This issue is fixed in version 9.46.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-15
UPDATED
Date2026-07-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-55576
SUMMARY

MaaAssistantArknights is a one-click tool for daily Arknights tasks. In the current dev-v2 workflow, .github/workflows/release-preparation.yml inlined attacker-controlled github.event.pull_request.title into a run: shell command during the pull_request opened, reopened, and ready_for_review events, so a non-draft fork PR whose title starts with Release v could execute shell commands on the ubuntu-latest runner during the generate-changelog job. This vulnerability is fixed by commit cafc3946059e6337d2089d4fec8b6885ba17c332.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-15
UPDATED
Date2026-07-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-55445
SUMMARY

Qinglong is a timed task management platform supporting Python3, JavaScript, Shell, and Typescript. Prior to 2.20.1, the init guard middleware in back/loaders/express.ts checks /api/user/init but not /open/user/init, while rewrite('/open/*', '/api/$1') rewrites the whitelisted /open/* path after JWT authentication and the guard have passed; an unauthenticated attacker can send PUT /open/user/init to reset administrator credentials on an initialized instance. This issue is fixed in 2.20.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-15
UPDATED
Date2026-07-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA