Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LabcorpLabcorp
VS
Memorial Hermann Health SystemMemorial Hermann Health System
Labcorp

Labcorp

531 South Spring Street, Burlington, 27215, US

Last Update: 25/09/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.labcorp.com
599/1000Very Poor

Clear and confident health care decisions begin with questions. At Labcorp, we’re constantly in pursuit of answers. As a global leader of innovative and comprehensive laboratory services, we help doctors, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, researchers and patients m...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:42,956
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2
Memorial Hermann Health System

Memorial Hermann Health System

Houston, US

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
757/1000Fair

Advancing Health. Personalizing Care. Memorial Hermann Health System is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. A fully integrated health system with more than 260 care delivery sites throughout the Greater Houston area...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:19,509
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Labcorp

Labcorp

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Memorial Hermann Health System

Memorial Hermann Health System

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Labcorp has 29.08% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Memorial Hermann Health System in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Labcorp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Labcorp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Memorial Hermann Health System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Memorial Hermann Health System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Labcorp

Labcorp

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LAB1790295835
🔒 Incident : Breach
PLALAB1790109185
🔒 Incident : Breach
LAB1790281763
Memorial Hermann Health System

Memorial Hermann Health System

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MEM12145522
🔒 Incident : Breach
MEM308071625

FAQ

Between Labcorp company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Labcorp company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Labcorp company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Labcorp company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Labcorp company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Labcorp company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Labcorp company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Labcorp company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Labcorp company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Labcorp company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Labcorp company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Labcorp and Memorial Hermann Health System, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Labcorp and Memorial Hermann Health System, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Labcorp or Memorial Hermann Health System ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Labcorp or Memorial Hermann Health System ?
Between Labcorp and Memorial Hermann Health System, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Labcorp and Memorial Hermann Health System, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3