Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&DSartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D
VS
Charles River LaboratoriesCharles River Laboratories
Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D

Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D

Otto-Brenner Straße 20, Göttingen, 37079, DE

Last Update: 23/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.sartorius.com/en
753/1000Fair

Lab Essentials for Research and Development provides you with a one-stop shop for R&D updates for a wide variety of applications and industries. We at Sartorius believe that listening to our customers - discussions with and among users - is a key component to deliver...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Charles River Laboratories

Charles River Laboratories

251 Ballardvale Street, Wilmington, Massachusetts, US, 01887

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://criver.com
776/1000Fair

At Charles River, we are guided by our strong purpose—to create healthier lives—which centers around the patients who rely on the therapeutics we help to develop, the animals in our care, to our planet, and to the passionate and skilled people who are at the heart of ou...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:14,867
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D

Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Charles River Laboratories

Charles River Laboratories

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charles River Laboratories in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Charles River Laboratories (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charles River Laboratories cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D

Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Charles River Laboratories

Charles River Laboratories

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D company and Charles River Laboratories company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D company and Charles River Laboratories company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D company and Charles River Laboratories company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D company and Charles River Laboratories company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D company and Charles River Laboratories company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D company and Charles River Laboratories company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D company and Charles River Laboratories company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D company and Charles River Laboratories company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D company and Charles River Laboratories company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D company and Charles River Laboratories company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D company and Charles River Laboratories company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D and Charles River Laboratories, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D and Charles River Laboratories, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D or Charles River Laboratories ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D or Charles River Laboratories ?
Between Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D and Charles River Laboratories, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sartorius | Lab Essentials for R&D and Charles River Laboratories, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8