Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

La Trobe University AlumniLa Trobe University Alumni
VS
ESSESS
La Trobe University Alumni

La Trobe University Alumni

Bundoora, 3086, AU

Last Update: 05/12/2025

View Profile
763/1000Fair

If you've completed a degree, diploma or certificate at La Trobe or one of our antecedent institutions, or are a former or current staff member, you are part of our alumni community! Membership is free, automatic and lifelong. With over 240,000 La Trobe alumni spanning ...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ESS

ESS

9202 S Northshore Dr, Knoxville, 37922, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ESS.com
780/1000Fair

As leaders in the education staffing space since 2000, ESS specializes in placing qualified staff in daily, long-term, and permanent K-12 school district positions, including substitute teachers, paraprofessionals, and other school support staff. Over the last 24 years,...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:14,412
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
La Trobe University Alumni

La Trobe University Alumni

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ESS

ESS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for La Trobe University Alumni in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ESS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - La Trobe University Alumni (X = Date, Y = Severity)

La Trobe University Alumni cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ESS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ESS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
La Trobe University Alumni

La Trobe University Alumni

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ESS

ESS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between La Trobe University Alumni company and ESS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between La Trobe University Alumni company and ESS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between La Trobe University Alumni company and ESS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between La Trobe University Alumni company and ESS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between La Trobe University Alumni company and ESS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between La Trobe University Alumni company and ESS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between La Trobe University Alumni company and ESS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between La Trobe University Alumni company and ESS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between La Trobe University Alumni company and ESS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between La Trobe University Alumni company and ESS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between La Trobe University Alumni company and ESS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between La Trobe University Alumni and ESS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between La Trobe University Alumni and ESS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - La Trobe University Alumni or ESS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - La Trobe University Alumni or ESS ?
Between La Trobe University Alumni and ESS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between La Trobe University Alumni and ESS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2