Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

La Piamontesa S.A.La Piamontesa S.A.
VS
Arla FoodsArla Foods
La Piamontesa S.A.

La Piamontesa S.A.

Averaldo Giacosa 391, Brinkmann, 2419, AR

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
707/1000Moderate

Nos dedicamos a la elaboración de fiambres, embutidos y afines, cumpliendo el ciclo integral que comprende: faena de porcinos, desposte bovino y porcino, producción de fiambres y embutidos, y comercialización de los productos.

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:211
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Arla Foods

Arla Foods

Sønderhøj 14, Viby, DK, 8260

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.arla.com
779/1000Fair

We are more than 23,000 colleagues across 39 countries and 7,624 dairy farmer-owners in Denmark, Sweden, United Kingdom, Germany, Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands. We aim to create the future of dairy, to bring healthy and sustainable dairy products to people ac...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:14,291
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
La Piamontesa S.A.

La Piamontesa S.A.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Arla Foods

Arla Foods

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for La Piamontesa S.A. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arla Foods in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - La Piamontesa S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

La Piamontesa S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Arla Foods (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arla Foods cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
La Piamontesa S.A.

La Piamontesa S.A.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
LAP015261122
Arla Foods

Arla Foods

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ARL858052025

FAQ

Between La Piamontesa S.A. company and Arla Foods company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between La Piamontesa S.A. company and Arla Foods company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between La Piamontesa S.A. company and Arla Foods company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between La Piamontesa S.A. company and Arla Foods company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between La Piamontesa S.A. company and Arla Foods company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between La Piamontesa S.A. company and Arla Foods company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between La Piamontesa S.A. company and Arla Foods company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between La Piamontesa S.A. company and Arla Foods company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between La Piamontesa S.A. company and Arla Foods company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between La Piamontesa S.A. company and Arla Foods company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between La Piamontesa S.A. company and Arla Foods company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between La Piamontesa S.A. and Arla Foods, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between La Piamontesa S.A. and Arla Foods, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - La Piamontesa S.A. or Arla Foods ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - La Piamontesa S.A. or Arla Foods ?
Between La Piamontesa S.A. and Arla Foods, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between La Piamontesa S.A. and Arla Foods, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1