Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

L.A. DarlingL.A. Darling
VS
John Lewis PartnershipJohn Lewis Partnership
L.A. Darling

L.A. Darling

1401 Hwy 49 B, Paragould, 72450, US

Last Update: 05/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ladarling.com
770/1000Fair

Since 1897, L.A. Darling has been at the forefront of designing and manufacturing custom retail displays and fixtures that enhance shopper engagement and drive profitability. Our comprehensive services include rapid prototyping, efficient production, and installation, t...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:209
Subsidiaries:74
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
John Lewis Partnership

John Lewis Partnership

Carlisle Place, London, England, GB, SW1P 1BX

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.jlpjobs.com
800/1000Good

We’re the largest employee owned business in the UK and home of our cherished brands, John Lewis and Waitrose. We’re not just employees, we’re Partners, driven by our purpose to build a happier world. As we look to our future, there’s never been a more exciting time to ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:36,147
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
L.A. Darling

L.A. Darling

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
John Lewis Partnership

John Lewis Partnership

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L.A. Darling in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for John Lewis Partnership in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - L.A. Darling (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L.A. Darling cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - John Lewis Partnership (X = Date, Y = Severity)

John Lewis Partnership cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
L.A. Darling

L.A. Darling

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
John Lewis Partnership

John Lewis Partnership

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between L.A. Darling company and John Lewis Partnership company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between L.A. Darling company and John Lewis Partnership company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between L.A. Darling company and John Lewis Partnership company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between L.A. Darling company and John Lewis Partnership company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between L.A. Darling company and John Lewis Partnership company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between L.A. Darling company and John Lewis Partnership company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between L.A. Darling company and John Lewis Partnership company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between L.A. Darling company and John Lewis Partnership company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between L.A. Darling company and John Lewis Partnership company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between L.A. Darling company and John Lewis Partnership company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between L.A. Darling company and John Lewis Partnership company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between L.A. Darling and John Lewis Partnership, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between L.A. Darling and John Lewis Partnership, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - L.A. Darling or John Lewis Partnership ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - L.A. Darling or John Lewis Partnership ?
Between L.A. Darling and John Lewis Partnership, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between L.A. Darling and John Lewis Partnership, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59858
SUMMARY

Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to 9.2.0735, the C omni-completion script in runtime/autoload/ccomplete.vim interpolates the typeref: or typename: extension field of a tags entry, without escaping, into a :vimgrep pattern that is run through :execute. Because :vimgrep honors the bar as a command separator, a crafted tag field can close the search pattern and append an arbitrary Ex command; opening a hostile .c file whose project tags file contains such an entry and invoking C omni-completion runs that command as the editing user. This issue is fixed in version 9.2.0735.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59857
SUMMARY

Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to 9.2.0725, the single-byte branch of spell_soundfold_sal() in src/spell.c translates a word through a spell file's SAL sound-folding rules into a caller-owned result buffer, but its result writes are guarded with reslen < MAXWLEN, allowing reslen to reach MAXWLEN before res[reslen] = NUL writes one byte past the end of the MAXWLEN-element stack buffer. A boundary-length word passed to soundfold(), or reached via sound-based spell suggestion while a SAL-based spell language is active under a non-multibyte 8-bit encoding, can corrupt the eval_soundfold() stack frame and crash the editor. This issue is fixed in version 9.2.0725.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59856
SUMMARY

Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to 9.2.0736, the PHP omni-completion script in runtime/autoload/phpcomplete.vim interpolates a class or trait name, taken from the contents of the edited buffer, into a search() pattern that is run via win_execute() without escaping. A name containing a single quote can terminate the search() string argument early, and because the bar is honored as an Ex command separator, the remainder of the name is run as Ex commands; via the :! command this allows arbitrary operating-system command execution when a victim opens a crafted PHP file and invokes omni-completion. This issue is fixed in version 9.2.0736.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59855
SUMMARY

SiYuan is an open-source personal knowledge management system. Prior to 3.7.1, Asset.render in app/src/asset/index.ts interpolates the unsanitized this.path value into HTML assigned to innerHTML, allowing a crafted asset link containing a double quote to break out of the src attribute, inject an event handler, and execute JavaScript that can run OS commands in the Electron renderer. This issue is fixed in versions 3.7.1-alpha.2 and 3.7.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59854
SUMMARY

SiYuan is an open-source personal knowledge management system. Prior to 3.7.1, POST /api/file/globalCopyFiles accepts attacker-supplied absolute source paths and relies on util.IsSensitivePath in kernel/util/path.go, whose denylist misses common home-directory credential files such as .git-credentials, .netrc, .pgpass, .kube/config, .docker/config.json, and .gnupg, allowing an authenticated administrator or API-token user to copy those files into the workspace and exfiltrate them through the file API. This issue is fixed in versions 3.7.1-alpha.2 and 3.7.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2