Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

L3Harris TechnologiesL3Harris Technologies
VS
ThalesThales
L3Harris Technologies

L3Harris Technologies

1025 W. NASA Boulevard, Melbourne, 32919, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.l3harris.com/
716/1000Moderate

L3Harris Technologies is the Trusted Disruptor in the defense industry. With customers’ mission-critical needs always in mind, our employees deliver end-to-end technology solutions connecting the space, air, land, sea and cyber domains in the interest of national securi...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:30,302
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1
Thales

Thales

6, Rue de la Verrerie, Meudon, 92190, FR

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.thalesgroup.com/
763/1000Fair

Thales (Euronext Paris: HO) is a global leader in advanced technologies for the Defence, Aerospace, and Cyber & Digital sectors. Its portfolio of innovative products and services addresses several major challenges: sovereignty, security, sustainability and inclusion. T...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:65,754
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
L3Harris Technologies

L3Harris Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Thales

Thales

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L3Harris Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Thales has 1.96% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - L3Harris Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L3Harris Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Thales (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thales cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
L3Harris Technologies

L3Harris Technologies

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
L3H5902259103025
🔒 Incident : Breach
APPL3H1773147416
🔒 Incident : Breach
L3H4092140103025
Thales

Thales

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
NXPTHASTM1775572928
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
THA430051424
🔒 Incident : Breach
THA123821122

FAQ

Between L3Harris Technologies company and Thales company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between L3Harris Technologies company and Thales company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between L3Harris Technologies company and Thales company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between L3Harris Technologies company and Thales company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between L3Harris Technologies company and Thales company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between L3Harris Technologies company and Thales company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between L3Harris Technologies company and Thales company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between L3Harris Technologies company and Thales company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between L3Harris Technologies company and Thales company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between L3Harris Technologies company and Thales company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between L3Harris Technologies company and Thales company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between L3Harris Technologies and Thales, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between L3Harris Technologies and Thales, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - L3Harris Technologies or Thales ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - L3Harris Technologies or Thales ?
Between L3Harris Technologies and Thales, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between L3Harris Technologies and Thales, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3