Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATIONL&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION
VS
Capgemini EngineeringCapgemini Engineering
L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION

L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION

Larsen & Toubro Limited , Construction, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600089, IN

Last Update: 08/02/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

L&T Smart World: An LTTS Unit is a leading system integrator and global connected intelligence solution provider. Founded in 2016 as a business unit of Larsen & Toubro Limited, it was acquired by L&T Technology Services (LTTS) in January 2023 to create L&T Smart World: ...

NAICS:54139
NAICS Definition:Engineering Services
Employees:132
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Capgemini Engineering

Capgemini Engineering

76, Avenue Kléber, Paris, 75116, FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

Capgemini Engineering is the engineering and R&D services powerhouse of the Capgemini Group, combining its broad industry knowledge and cutting-edge technologies in digital and software to support the convergence of the physical and digital worlds. Coupled with the capa...

NAICS:54139
NAICS Definition:Engineering Services
Employees:44,564
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION

L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Capgemini Engineering

Capgemini Engineering

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capgemini Engineering in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Capgemini Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capgemini Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION

L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Capgemini Engineering

Capgemini Engineering

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION company and Capgemini Engineering company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION company and Capgemini Engineering company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION company and Capgemini Engineering company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION company and Capgemini Engineering company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION company and Capgemini Engineering company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION company and Capgemini Engineering company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION company and Capgemini Engineering company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION company and Capgemini Engineering company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION company and Capgemini Engineering company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION company and Capgemini Engineering company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION company and Capgemini Engineering company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION and Capgemini Engineering, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION and Capgemini Engineering, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION or Capgemini Engineering ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION or Capgemini Engineering ?
Between L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION and Capgemini Engineering, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between L&T SMART WORLD & COMMUNICATION and Capgemini Engineering, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85456
SUMMARY

MOOS-IvP through 24.8.1 fails to properly validate variable names extracted from alog files in the SplitHandler, allowing attackers to write files outside the split directory. Attackers can supply crafted alog files with backslash sequences in variable names to escape the output directory and append to arbitrary files on Windows systems.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-03
UPDATED
Date2026-09-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-85455
SUMMARY

MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 contains a buffer over-read vulnerability in CMOOSCommPkt where a four-byte packet triggers out-of-bounds memory access during deserialization. Attackers can open a TCP connection to the MOOSDB port and send a crafted short packet to read memory before authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-03
UPDATED
Date2026-09-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-85454
SUMMARY

MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in CMOOSSerialPort::GetTelegram() that writes a NUL terminator one byte past the serial telegram stack buffer. Attackers controlling the serial line can send a full-length telegram to trigger the off-by-one write, corrupting the stack and potentially enabling code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-03
UPDATED
Date2026-09-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
0.9
CVE-2026-85453
SUMMARY

MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 fails to escape database contents when rendering MOOSDB HTTP pages, allowing attackers to inject malicious scripts. Any MOOS publisher can set variable values containing script payloads that execute in the browser of operators viewing the web interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-03
UPDATED
Date2026-09-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-85452
SUMMARY

MOOS ui-moos through 50b9c6c contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in ScopeTabPane.cpp and ScopeGrid.cpp where client and variable names are formatted into fixed 1024-byte buffers using sprintf without length validation. Attackers can supply arbitrarily long MOOS identifiers that overflow the buffers when an operator selects process list entries or pokes variables, enabling code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-03
UPDATED
Date2026-09-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8