Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

L&T Heavy EngineeringL&T Heavy Engineering
VS
Alpargatas S.A.Alpargatas S.A.
L&T Heavy Engineering

L&T Heavy Engineering

Gate No. 1, Powai Campus, , North Block I, 3rd Floor, Saki Vihar Road, Powai, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400 072

Last Update: 27/02/2026

View Profile

L&T Heavy Engineering business is global leader in supply of the Engineered to order hi-tech equipment needs of Refinery, Oil & Gas, Fertilizer, Petrochemicals and Nuclear plants. The business has been at the forefront of introducing digital Industry 4.0 techniques, pro...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:1,532
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Alpargatas S.A.

Alpargatas S.A.

Av. das Nações Unidas, 14.261, São Paulo, 04794-000, BR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.alpargatas.com.br
796/1000Fair

We are a global company, founded and based in Brazil for over 115 years. We are committed to delight the world with amazing brands, that convey lightness and joy to the everyday lives of our consumers. We own Havaianas brand, world leader in open shoes, known for the ic...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:14,284
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
L&T Heavy Engineering

L&T Heavy Engineering

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Alpargatas S.A.

Alpargatas S.A.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L&T Heavy Engineering in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alpargatas S.A. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - L&T Heavy Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L&T Heavy Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Alpargatas S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alpargatas S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
L&T Heavy Engineering

L&T Heavy Engineering

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Alpargatas S.A.

Alpargatas S.A.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between L&T Heavy Engineering company and Alpargatas S.A. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between L&T Heavy Engineering company and Alpargatas S.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between L&T Heavy Engineering company and Alpargatas S.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between L&T Heavy Engineering company and Alpargatas S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between L&T Heavy Engineering company and Alpargatas S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between L&T Heavy Engineering company and Alpargatas S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between L&T Heavy Engineering company and Alpargatas S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between L&T Heavy Engineering company and Alpargatas S.A. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between L&T Heavy Engineering company and Alpargatas S.A. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between L&T Heavy Engineering company and Alpargatas S.A. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between L&T Heavy Engineering company and Alpargatas S.A. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between L&T Heavy Engineering and Alpargatas S.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between L&T Heavy Engineering and Alpargatas S.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - L&T Heavy Engineering or Alpargatas S.A. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - L&T Heavy Engineering or Alpargatas S.A. ?
Between L&T Heavy Engineering and Alpargatas S.A., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between L&T Heavy Engineering and Alpargatas S.A., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8