Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

L P International Inc. / PowerMateL P International Inc. / PowerMate
VS
Atlas CopcoAtlas Copco
L P International Inc. / PowerMate

L P International Inc. / PowerMate

Box 696, 151 Savannah Oaks Dr, Brantford, ON, N3T 5P9, CA

Last Update: 26/12/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.powermate.info
744/1000Moderate

L P International Inc. is a private Canadian company founded to manufacture and distribute a line of unique motorized electric stairclimbing hand trucks. The company's head office and manufacturing facilities are located in Brantford, Ontario where it has made steady gr...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:11
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Atlas Copco

Atlas Copco

Sickla Industriväg 19, Stockholm, SE, 131 54

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

Atlas Copco delivers innovative products and solutions that help businesses grow and drive progress. Our portfolio spans compressed air and gas systems and treatment, vacuum solutions, industrial power tools, assembly systems, and power and flow solutions. We bring a ...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:35,258
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
L P International Inc. / PowerMate

L P International Inc. / PowerMate

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Atlas Copco

Atlas Copco

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L P International Inc. / PowerMate in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlas Copco in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - L P International Inc. / PowerMate (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L P International Inc. / PowerMate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Atlas Copco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlas Copco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
L P International Inc. / PowerMate

L P International Inc. / PowerMate

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Atlas Copco

Atlas Copco

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between L P International Inc. / PowerMate company and Atlas Copco company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between L P International Inc. / PowerMate company and Atlas Copco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between L P International Inc. / PowerMate company and Atlas Copco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between L P International Inc. / PowerMate company and Atlas Copco company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between L P International Inc. / PowerMate company and Atlas Copco company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between L P International Inc. / PowerMate company and Atlas Copco company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between L P International Inc. / PowerMate company and Atlas Copco company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between L P International Inc. / PowerMate company and Atlas Copco company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between L P International Inc. / PowerMate company and Atlas Copco company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between L P International Inc. / PowerMate company and Atlas Copco company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between L P International Inc. / PowerMate company and Atlas Copco company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between L P International Inc. / PowerMate and Atlas Copco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between L P International Inc. / PowerMate and Atlas Copco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - L P International Inc. / PowerMate or Atlas Copco ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - L P International Inc. / PowerMate or Atlas Copco ?
Between L P International Inc. / PowerMate and Atlas Copco, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between L P International Inc. / PowerMate and Atlas Copco, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1