Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

L&T Infrastructure Development Projects LimitedL&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited
VS
Transport for NSWTransport for NSW
L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited

L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited

undefined, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600089, IN

Last Update: 26/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.Lntidpl.com
752/1000Fair

L&T IDPL is in the Infrastructure Development space in Roads, Transmission Lines, Railways & Metro, Water supply, Ports and other emerging sectors with primary focus in the Indian Market. L&T IDPL holds concession for building, operating and maintaining several Toll ...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:Truck Transportation
Employees:537
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Transport for NSW

Transport for NSW

Multiple locations , Multiple locations across the state, AU

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
755/1000Fair

We’re an innovative NSW government organisation comprised of a network of agencies and divisions that keep the state moving. Our focus is on delivering safe, reliable and integrated transport networks for everyone. With over 28,000 team members, we’re committed to incl...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:Truck Transportation
Employees:18,452
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited

L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Transport for NSW

Transport for NSW

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transport for NSW in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Transport for NSW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transport for NSW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited

L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Transport for NSW

Transport for NSW

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TRA303092125

FAQ

Between L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited company and Transport for NSW company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited company and Transport for NSW company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited company and Transport for NSW company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited company and Transport for NSW company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited company and Transport for NSW company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited and Transport for NSW, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited and Transport for NSW, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited or Transport for NSW ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited or Transport for NSW ?
Between L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited and Transport for NSW, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Limited and Transport for NSW, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2