Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

L&S MechanicalL&S Mechanical
VS
Kier GroupKier Group
L&S Mechanical

L&S Mechanical

1101 E Arapaho Rd, Richardson, 75081, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.lsmech.com
621/1000Poor

L&S Mechanical began as a Dallas-based contractor in 1985 and has grown over the years to have six locations out of Dallas, Fort Worth, Houston, San Antonio, and Austin. Over the past thirty years, we have become known as the premier provider of new home construction i...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:228
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Kier Group

Kier Group

Cavendish Place, UK, GB

Last Update: 09/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kier.co.uk
757/1000Fair

Our purpose is to sustainably deliver infrastructure which is vital to the UK. As a leading provider of infrastructure services, construction and property developments, we are committed to delivering for communities and leaving lasting legacies through our work. We are...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:11,329
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
L&S Mechanical

L&S Mechanical

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Kier Group

Kier Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

L&S Mechanical has 37.11% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kier Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - L&S Mechanical (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L&S Mechanical cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Kier Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kier Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
L&S Mechanical

L&S Mechanical

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
L&S1772836444
Kier Group

Kier Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between L&S Mechanical company and Kier Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between L&S Mechanical company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between L&S Mechanical company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between L&S Mechanical company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between L&S Mechanical company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between L&S Mechanical company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between L&S Mechanical company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between L&S Mechanical company and Kier Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between L&S Mechanical company and Kier Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between L&S Mechanical company and Kier Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between L&S Mechanical company and Kier Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between L&S Mechanical and Kier Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between L&S Mechanical and Kier Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - L&S Mechanical or Kier Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - L&S Mechanical or Kier Group ?
Between L&S Mechanical and Kier Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between L&S Mechanical and Kier Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3