Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Kyndryl

Kyndryl Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

kyndryl.com

We have the world’s best talent that design, run, and manage the most advanced and reliable technology infrastructure each day. Together, we think holistically about the health of these vital technology ecosystems. We are a focused, independent company that builds on our foundation of excellence by creating systems in new ways. Bringing in the right partners, investing in our business, and working side-by-side with our customers to unlock potential. We're raising the bar. Our experience speaks for itself: We have tens of thousands of highly skilled employees around the world serving most of the Fortune 100 companies. But our purpose is what drives us: Advancing the vital systems that power human progress. Because when a digital ecosystem


Kyndryl A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Kyndryl
Company Information
Website:https://kyndryl.com
Employees number:61,535
Number of followers:598,993
NAICS:5415
Industry Type:IT Services and IT Consulting
Homepage:kyndryl.com
Kyndryl Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
logo
KyndrylIT Services and IT Consulting
Updated:
17/08/2026
733/1000
Moderate
Ba
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Kyndryl Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
KyndrylIT Services and IT Consulting
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Kyndryl
KyndrylModerate
Current Score
733Ba (MODERATE)
01000
2 incidents
-84 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
SEPTEMBER 2026
651Before Incident
AUGUST 2026
733Before Incident
Breach
10 Aug 2026Kyndryl
HCLTech and TCS: HCLTech says stolen data may be years-old after hacker’s data breach claims

HCLTech Employee Data Allegedly Leaked in Dark Web Breach

649After Incident
HIGH-84
HCLTAT1786448292
HCLTech Employee Data Allegedly Leaked in Dark Web Breach A threat actor claimed on a dark web forum to be selling a dataset allegedly belonging to HCLTech, containing details of over 250,000 employees. The exposed information reportedly includes full names, email addresses, job titles, departments, phone numbers, physical addresses, and employee and service account records. The hacker asserted that the data was obtained from a Microsoft Azure Tenant using compromised credentials, raising concerns about the growing sophistication of AI-driven cyberattacks. The incident follows a broader trend of enterprises bolstering their defenses in cloud security, AI security, and threat intelligence to counter evolving threats. HCLTech denied a breach of its internal systems, stating that its investigation found the allegedly stolen data to be limited and potentially years old, with no evidence of compromise to client engagement systems. The company confirmed that its operational systems remain unaffected and that existing safeguards implemented over two years ago remain effective. Meanwhile, TCS acknowledged receiving alerts about potential exposure of certain employee data but clarified that there was no indication of customer data or systems being impacted. The company noted that the referenced information appeared to be over four years old and limited to basic employee details. The claims were first reported by Intel and Breaches, a dark web monitoring account on X (formerly Twitter). However, the authenticity of the data dump and the threat actor’s assertions have not been independently verified. The incident underscores the persistent risks of credential-based attacks on cloud environments, particularly as cybercriminals leverage AI to automate and scale their operations. Both HCLTech and TCS continue to investigate the matter, with HCLTech stating that any material findings will be reported accordingly.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
MOTIVATION
Financial Gain (Data Sale)
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Employee data (full names, email addresses, job titles, departments, phone numbers, physical addresses, employee and service account records)Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damageIdentity Theft Risk: High (PII exposed)
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Employee data (PII, job details, contact information)Number Of Records Exposed: 250,000+ (HCLTech), unspecified (TCS)Sensitivity Of Data: High (PII)Data Exfiltration: Allegedly sold on dark webPersonally Identifiable Information: Full names, email addresses, phone numbers, physical addresses, job titles, departments
JULY 2026
761Before Incident
JUNE 2026
761Before Incident
MAY 2026
763Before Incident
APRIL 2026
763Before Incident
MARCH 2026
763Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
763Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
763Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
763Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
763Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
763Before Incident
MAY 2022
762Before Incident
Breach
01 May 2022Kyndryl
Kyndryl, Microsoft, Vodafone, McDonald’s, HCL Technologies, IHG Hotels & Resorts, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts and Gap: Crook hawks millions of records allegedly plundered from corporate Azure tenants

Massive Employee Data Breach Allegedly Hits Microsoft Azure Customers, Including McDonald’s and Vodafone

678After Incident
CRITICAL-84
IHGHCLGAPWYNMCDVODKYNMIC1786975327
Massive Employee Data Breach Allegedly Hits Microsoft Azure Customers, Including McDonald’s and Vodafone A threat actor known as TheHatman claims to have stolen millions of employee records from Microsoft Azure environments belonging to nine major corporations, including McDonald’s, Vodafone, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), and Kyndryl. The stolen data, advertised for sale, reportedly includes 1.7 million records from McDonald’s the largest dataset alongside hundreds of thousands from other firms like HCL Technologies, IHG Hotels & Resorts, Gap, and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts. Cybersecurity firm Hudson Rock, which uncovered the breach, assessed the data as "highly likely authentic," noting that the records contain far more than basic contact details. Samples reviewed by the firm include phone numbers, physical addresses, employee IDs, job titles, department structures, office locations, and even accounts with Global Administrator privileges potentially giving attackers a roadmap for targeted phishing or privilege escalation. The method of compromise remains unclear. TheHatman claims to have used compromised credentials, but Hudson Rock could not verify the initial access vector. Possible entry points include infostealer malware, phishing, weak or missing multi-factor authentication (MFA), or overly permissive third-party applications. The firm’s analysis suggests the breach likely stems from targeted infostealer infections rather than a widespread Azure vulnerability, as the affected organizations are predominantly large enterprises. Responses from the impacted companies have been mixed. Tata Consultancy Services acknowledged receiving threat intelligence alerts about potential exposure of employee data but stated that its investigation found no evidence of a breach in its systems or customer environments. The company noted that the allegedly exposed data appears to be outdated (over four years old) and limited to basic employee information, with no impact on customer or operational systems. TCS also claimed its security controls including protections against password spraying and MFA fatigue remain effective. Microsoft and the other named organizations have not yet provided public confirmation of the breach or its scope. The full extent of the incident, including how the attacker exfiltrated data from multiple corporate Azure directories, remains under investigation.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
MOTIVATION
Financial gain (data sold on dark web)
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Employee records (1.7M+ from McDonald’s, hundreds of thousands from others)Systems Affected: Microsoft Azure environmentsIdentity Theft Risk: High (PII exposed)
DATA BREACH
Employee IDsJob titlesDepartment structuresOffice locationsPhone numbersPhysical addressesGlobal Administrator accountsNumber Of Records Exposed: Millions (1.7M+ from McDonald’s alone)Sensitivity Of Data: High (PII, administrative privileges)Data Exfiltration: Yes (advertised for sale)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Kyndryl ?
?
What was Kyndryl's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2026 ?
?
What was Kyndryl's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ?
?
What was Kyndryl's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was Kyndryl's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Kyndryl's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Kyndryl's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Kyndryl's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Kyndryl's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Kyndryl's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Kyndryl's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Kyndryl's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Kyndryl's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Kyndryl ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Kyndryl's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?