Comparison Overview

Kyndryl

VS

Serco

Kyndryl

New York City, New York, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://kyndryl.com

We have the world’s best talent that design, run, and manage the most advanced and reliable technology infrastructure each day. Together, we think holistically about the health of these vital technology ecosystems. We are a focused, independent company that builds on our foundation of excellence by creating systems in new ways. Bringing in the right partners, investing in our business, and working side-by-side with our customers to unlock potential. We're raising the bar. Our experience speaks for itself: We have tens of thousands of highly skilled employees around the world serving most of the Fortune 100 companies. But our purpose is what drives us: Advancing the vital systems that power human progress. Because when a digital ecosystem is healthy, it can more readily adapt and support continuous growth and that opens up a world of possibility for everyone. Together, we are the heart of progress.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 56,311
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Serco

16 Bartley Wood Business Park, Bartley Way, Hook, Hook, Hampshire, GB, RG27 9UY
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.serco.com/

We bring together the right people, the right technology and the right partners to create innovative solutions that make positive impact and address some of the most urgent and complex challenges facing the modern world. With a focus on serving governments globally, Serco’s services span justice, migration, defence, space, customer services, health, and transport. Our core capabilities include service design and advisory, resourcing, complex programme management, systems integration, case management, engineering, and asset & facilities management.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 31,499
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kyndryl.jpeg
Kyndryl
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/serco.jpeg
Serco
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kyndryl
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Serco
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kyndryl in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Serco in 2025.

Incident History — Kyndryl (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kyndryl cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Serco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Serco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kyndryl.jpeg
Kyndryl
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/serco.jpeg
Serco
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Accidental Sharing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Kyndryl company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Serco company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Serco company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Kyndryl company has not reported any.

In the current year, Serco company and Kyndryl company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Serco company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Kyndryl company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Serco company nor Kyndryl company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Serco company nor Kyndryl company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kyndryl company nor Serco company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kyndryl nor Serco holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both Serco company and Kyndryl company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

Kyndryl company employs more people globally than Serco company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Kyndryl nor Serco holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kyndryl nor Serco holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kyndryl nor Serco holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kyndryl nor Serco holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kyndryl nor Serco holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kyndryl nor Serco holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References