Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kymen Seudun OsuuskauppaKymen Seudun Osuuskauppa
VS
Harbor Freight ToolsHarbor Freight Tools
Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa

Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa

Tommolankatu 9 Kouvola, Southern Finland 45130, FI

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile
755/1000Fair

Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa on koko Kymenlaakson alueella toimiva S-ryhm√§n alueosuuskauppa, jonka teht√§v√§n√§ on tuottaa monipuolisia ja kilpailukykyisi√§ etuja ja palveluja asiakasomistajilleen. Harjoitamme marketkauppaa, matkailu- ja ravitsemiskauppaa, tavaratalo- ja e...

NAICS:452
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:1,001-5,000
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Harbor Freight Tools

Harbor Freight Tools

26677 Agoura Road, Calabasas, 91302, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.HFJobs.com
797/1000Fair

We're a 45 year-old, $8 billion national tool retailer with the energy, enthusiasm, and growth potential of a start-up. We have over 1,600 stores in 48 states across the country and are opening several new locations every week. We offer our customers more than 7,000 too...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:15,933
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa

Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Harbor Freight Tools

Harbor Freight Tools

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Harbor Freight Tools in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Harbor Freight Tools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Harbor Freight Tools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa

Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Harbor Freight Tools

Harbor Freight Tools

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HAR305072525

FAQ

Between Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa company and Harbor Freight Tools company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa company and Harbor Freight Tools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa company and Harbor Freight Tools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa company and Harbor Freight Tools company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa company and Harbor Freight Tools company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa company and Harbor Freight Tools company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa company and Harbor Freight Tools company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa company and Harbor Freight Tools company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa company and Harbor Freight Tools company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa company and Harbor Freight Tools company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa company and Harbor Freight Tools company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa and Harbor Freight Tools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa and Harbor Freight Tools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa or Harbor Freight Tools ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa or Harbor Freight Tools ?
Between Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa and Harbor Freight Tools, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kymen Seudun Osuuskauppa and Harbor Freight Tools, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2