Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kwik Trip, Inc.Kwik Trip, Inc.
VS
Endeavour GroupEndeavour Group
Kwik Trip, Inc.

Kwik Trip, Inc.

1626 Oak St., La Crosse, 54602, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://jobs.kwiktrip.com/
763/1000Fair

Our Mission: To serve our customers and community more effectively than anyone else by treating our customers, co-workers, and suppliers as we, personally, would like to be treated and to make a difference in someone's life. Kwik Trip is unique in the convenience sto...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:9,483
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Endeavour Group

Endeavour Group

26 Waterloo St, Sydney, 2010, AU

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
783/1000Fair

At Endeavour Group we exist to bring people together in better, more enjoyable, and more meaningful ways. Because we believe that social communities are thriving communities, built through great experiences and positive, memorable moments. United behind a common purpo...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:10,732
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kwik Trip, Inc.

Kwik Trip, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Endeavour Group

Endeavour Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kwik Trip, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Endeavour Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Kwik Trip, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kwik Trip, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Endeavour Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Endeavour Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kwik Trip, Inc.

Kwik Trip, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
KWI112101123
Endeavour Group

Endeavour Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Kwik Trip, Inc. company and Endeavour Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kwik Trip, Inc. company and Endeavour Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kwik Trip, Inc. company and Endeavour Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kwik Trip, Inc. company and Endeavour Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kwik Trip, Inc. company and Endeavour Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kwik Trip, Inc. company and Endeavour Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kwik Trip, Inc. company and Endeavour Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kwik Trip, Inc. company and Endeavour Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kwik Trip, Inc. company and Endeavour Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kwik Trip, Inc. company and Endeavour Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kwik Trip, Inc. company and Endeavour Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kwik Trip, Inc. and Endeavour Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kwik Trip, Inc. and Endeavour Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kwik Trip, Inc. or Endeavour Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kwik Trip, Inc. or Endeavour Group ?
Between Kwik Trip, Inc. and Endeavour Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kwik Trip, Inc. and Endeavour Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1