Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCOKuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO
VS
AllianzAllianz
Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO

Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO

N/A

Last Update: 18/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kipco.com/
758/1000Fair

Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) – KIPCO – is a holding company that invests in the Middle East and North Africa. Its strategy of acquiring, building, scaling and selling companies in the MENA region has worked successfully for over 30 years. KIPCO’s main business se...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:1,046
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Allianz

Allianz

Koeniginstrasse 28, Munich, 80802, DE

Last Update: 13/05/2026

View Profile
710/1000Moderate

The Allianz Group is one of the world's leading insurers and asset managers with more than 100 million private and corporate customers in nearly 70 countries. We are proud to be the Worldwide Insurance Partner of the Olympic & Paralympic Movements from 2021 until 2032 a...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:150,541
Subsidiaries:95
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO

Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Allianz

Allianz

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allianz in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Allianz (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allianz cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO

Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Allianz

Allianz

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MEREQUUNIMAEMGMGOOTOYSNOALLORARIPTIC1775528897
🔒 Incident : Breach
GAI0292402112125
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ALL435050724

FAQ

Between Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO company and Allianz company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO company and Allianz company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO company and Allianz company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO company and Allianz company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO company and Allianz company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO company and Allianz company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO company and Allianz company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO company and Allianz company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO company and Allianz company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO company and Allianz company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO company and Allianz company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO and Allianz, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO and Allianz, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO or Allianz ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO or Allianz ?
Between Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO and Allianz, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kuwait Projects Company (Holding) - KIPCO and Allianz, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8