Comparison Overview
KU Leuven Research & Development

KU Leuven Research & Development
Waaistraat 6, 3000 Leuven, Leuven, 3000, BE
Last Update: 03/02/2026
KU Leuven Research & Development (LRD) supports scientists who want to transform their research into impactful innovations. As the KU Leuven Association’s technology transfer office, we guide them in putting their research results at the service of society, economy and ...

Technical University of Munich
Arcisstraße 21, München, Munich, Bavaria, DE, 80333
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Our university combines top-class facilities for cutting-edge research with unique learning opportunities for 52,000 students. Whether our researchers are investigating the origins of life, matter and the universe or looking for solutions to the major challenges for our...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

KU Leuven Research & Development







Technical University of Munich






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for KU Leuven Research & Development in 2026.
Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Technical University of Munich in 2026.
Incident History - KU Leuven Research & Development (X = Date, Y = Severity)
KU Leuven Research & Development cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Technical University of Munich (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Technical University of Munich cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

KU Leuven Research & Development

Technical University of Munich
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.