Comparison Overview

KUKA

VS

ABB

KUKA

Zugspitzstr. 140, Augsburg, 86165, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

KUKA SE & Co. KGaA is a global leader in intelligent automation solutions, generating around 3.7 billion euro in sales and employing approximately 15,000 people worldwide. Headquartered in Augsburg, Germany, KUKA’s mission is to make automation accessible for everyone - simple, intuitive and sustainable. With a strong focus on digital transformation, human-robot collaboration, and AI-driven solutions, KUKA provides everything from robots and cells to fully automated systems and their connectivity. Our solutions serve key industries such as as automotive with a focus on e-mobility & battery, electronics, metal & plastic, consumer goods, food, e-commerce, retail, and healthcare. In addition, KUKA is committed to sustainable technologies and circular processes, combining ecological responsibility with efficiency.

NAICS: 33325
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,625
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ABB

Affolternstrasse 44, Zurich, ZH, CH, 8050
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

ABB is a technology leader in electrification and automation, enabling a more sustainable and resource-efficient future. The company’s solutions connect engineering know-how and software to optimize how things are manufactured, moved, powered and operated. Building on over 140 years of excellence, ABB’s more than 110,000 employees are committed to driving innovations that accelerate industrial transformation. www.abb.com Privacy notice & house rules: https://social.abb/social-media-information Before applying for a job at ABB, please read our Fraud Warning: https://careers.abb/global/en/fraud-warning

NAICS: 33325
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 112,125
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kukaglobal.jpeg
KUKA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abb.jpeg
ABB
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
KUKA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ABB
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KUKA in 2025.

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABB in 2025.

Incident History — KUKA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KUKA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ABB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ABB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kukaglobal.jpeg
KUKA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abb.jpeg
ABB
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Human-operated ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial (presumed, due to ransomware tactics)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Windows Active Directory
Motivation: Data theft and ransom
Blog: Blog

FAQ

KUKA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ABB company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ABB company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas KUKA company has not reported any.

In the current year, ABB company and KUKA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

ABB company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while KUKA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

ABB company has disclosed at least one data breach, while KUKA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

ABB company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while KUKA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither KUKA company nor ABB company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither KUKA nor ABB holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ABB company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to KUKA company.

ABB company employs more people globally than KUKA company, reflecting its scale as a Automation Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither KUKA nor ABB holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither KUKA nor ABB holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither KUKA nor ABB holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither KUKA nor ABB holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither KUKA nor ABB holds HIPAA certification.

Neither KUKA nor ABB holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H