Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kugler-Womako GmbHKugler-Womako GmbH
VS
KonecranesKonecranes
Kugler-Womako GmbH

Kugler-Womako GmbH

Schlosserstraße 15, Nürtingen, undefined, 72622, DE

Last Update: 30/11/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.kugler-womako.com
743/1000Moderate

Kugler-Womako has a long tradition as a supplier of machinery for the paper processing industry. Because of the merger of the two eponymously named companies in 1999, expertise in the fields of machine manufacturing for security documents and in the stationery / bookbin...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:12
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Konecranes

Konecranes

P.O. Box 661, Koneenkatu 8, Hyvinkaa, FI, 05801

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.konecranes.com
790/1000Fair

Konecranes is a global leader in material handling solutions, serving a broad range of customers across multiple industries. We consistently set the industry benchmark, from everyday improvements to the breakthroughs at moments that matter most, because we know we can a...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:11,292
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kugler-Womako GmbH

Kugler-Womako GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Konecranes

Konecranes

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kugler-Womako GmbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Konecranes in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Kugler-Womako GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kugler-Womako GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Konecranes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Konecranes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kugler-Womako GmbH

Kugler-Womako GmbH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Konecranes

Konecranes

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Kugler-Womako GmbH company and Konecranes company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kugler-Womako GmbH company and Konecranes company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kugler-Womako GmbH company and Konecranes company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kugler-Womako GmbH company and Konecranes company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kugler-Womako GmbH company and Konecranes company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kugler-Womako GmbH company and Konecranes company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kugler-Womako GmbH company and Konecranes company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kugler-Womako GmbH company and Konecranes company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kugler-Womako GmbH company and Konecranes company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kugler-Womako GmbH company and Konecranes company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kugler-Womako GmbH company and Konecranes company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kugler-Womako GmbH and Konecranes, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kugler-Womako GmbH and Konecranes, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kugler-Womako GmbH or Konecranes ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kugler-Womako GmbH or Konecranes ?
Between Kugler-Womako GmbH and Konecranes, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kugler-Womako GmbH and Konecranes, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA