Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kudelski SecurityKudelski Security
VS
HCLTechHCLTech
Kudelski Security

Kudelski Security

Route de Genève 22-24, Cheseaux, CH 1033, CH

Last Update: 13/02/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

Kudelski Security is a premier cybersecurity solutions provider, working with the most security-conscious organizations in Europe and across the United States. Our long-term approach to client partnerships enables us to continuously evaluate their security posture to de...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:405
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
HCLTech

HCLTech

Noida, Uttar Pradesh, IN, 201301

Last Update: 19/05/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.hcltech.com
837/1000Good

HCLTech is a global technology company, home to more than 227,000 people across 60 countries, delivering industry-leading capabilities centered around AI, digital, engineering, cloud and software, powered by a broad portfolio of technology services and products. We work...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:251,141
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kudelski Security

Kudelski Security

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
HCLTech

HCLTech

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kudelski Security in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HCLTech in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Kudelski Security (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kudelski Security cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - HCLTech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HCLTech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kudelski Security

Kudelski Security

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
HCLTech

HCLTech

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Kudelski Security company and HCLTech company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kudelski Security company and HCLTech company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kudelski Security company and HCLTech company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kudelski Security company and HCLTech company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kudelski Security company and HCLTech company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kudelski Security company and HCLTech company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kudelski Security company and HCLTech company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kudelski Security company and HCLTech company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kudelski Security company and HCLTech company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kudelski Security company and HCLTech company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kudelski Security company and HCLTech company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kudelski Security and HCLTech, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kudelski Security and HCLTech, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kudelski Security or HCLTech ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kudelski Security or HCLTech ?
Between Kudelski Security and HCLTech, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kudelski Security and HCLTech, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA