Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Kubernetes

Kubernetes Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

kubernetes.io

Kubernetes is an open source system for managing containerized applications across multiple hosts. Kubernetes builds upon a decade and a half of experience at Google running production workloads at scale using a system called Borg, combined with best-of-breed ideas and practices from the community. Kubernetes is hosted by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF). If your company wants to help shape the evolution of technologies that are container-packaged, dynamically scheduled, and microservices-oriented, consider joining the CNCF. For details about who's involved and how Kubernetes plays a role, read the CNCF announcement.


Kubernetes A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Kubernetes
Company Information
Website:https://kubernetes.io/
Employees number:90
Number of followers:20,144
NAICS:5112
Industry Type:Software Development
Homepage:kubernetes.io
Kubernetes Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
logo
KubernetesSoftware Development
Updated:
01/04/2026
741/1000
Moderate
Ba
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Kubernetes Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
KubernetesSoftware Development
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Kubernetes
KubernetesModerate
Current Score
741Ba (MODERATE)
01000
3 incidents
-5 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
742Before Incident
MAY 2026
742Before Incident
APRIL 2026
742Before Incident
MARCH 2026
746Before Incident
Vulnerability
17 Mar 2026Kubernetes
Kubernetes: Kubernetes CSI Driver for NFS Vulnerability Lets Attackers Delete or Modify NFS Server Directories

Kubernetes NFS CSI Driver Vulnerability Exposes Clusters to Path Traversal Attacks

741After Incident
CRITICAL-5
KUB1773764746
Kubernetes NFS CSI Driver Vulnerability Exposes Clusters to Path Traversal Attacks A critical path traversal vulnerability has been discovered in the Kubernetes Container Storage Interface (CSI) Driver for NFS, potentially allowing attackers to delete or modify unintended directories on connected NFS servers. The flaw (tracked under CVE-2024-3177) arises from insufficient validation of the `subDir` parameter in volume identifiers, enabling malicious actors to exploit clusters where users can create PersistentVolumes referencing the NFS CSI driver. ### How the Vulnerability Works The issue lies in how the CSI driver processes the `subDir` parameter during volume operations. Attackers with permissions to create PersistentVolumes using the `nfs.csi.k8s.io` driver can craft volume identifiers containing path traversal sequences (e.g., `../`). When the driver executes deletion or cleanup operations, it may traverse outside the intended directory scope, leading to unauthorized modifications or deletions on the NFS server. For example, a maliciously crafted `volumeHandle` like `/tmp/mount-uuid/legitimate/../../../exports/subdir` could force the CSI controller to operate on unintended directories. ### Affected Systems & Risk Conditions Organizations are at risk if they meet all of the following criteria: - Running the NFS CSI Driver (`nfs.csi.k8s.io`) in their Kubernetes cluster. - Allowing non-administrator users to create PersistentVolumes referencing the NFS CSI driver. - Using a vulnerable version of the driver (all versions prior to v4.13.1). ### Detection & Exploitation Indicators Administrators can check for exposure by: - Inspecting PersistentVolumes using the NFS CSI driver for traversal sequences (e.g., `../`) in the `volumeHandle` field. - Reviewing CSI controller logs for suspicious directory operations, such as: ``` Removing subPath: /tmp/mount-uuid/legitimate/../../../exports/subdir ``` Clusters showing signs of exploitation should be reported to [email protected]. ### Remediation & Mitigation The primary fix is upgrading the NFS CSI Driver to v4.13.1 or later, which includes proper validation of traversal sequences. Interim measures include: - Restricting PersistentVolume creation privileges to trusted users. - Auditing NFS exports to ensure only intended directories are writable by the driver. ### Disclosure & Credits The vulnerability was responsibly disclosed by Shaul Ben Hai, Senior Staff Security Researcher at SentinelOne. The fix was developed by Andy Zhang and Rita Zhang of the CSI Driver for NFS maintainers, in coordination with the Kubernetes Security Response Committee.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vulnerability Exploitation
IMPACT
Systems Affected: NFS servers connected to vulnerable Kubernetes clustersOperational Impact: Unauthorized deletion or modification of directories on NFS servers
FEBRUARY 2026
751Before Incident
Vulnerability
04 Feb 2026Kubernetes
Kubernetes: Ingress-Nginx Vulnerability Allow Attackers to Execute Arbitrary Code

Critical Code Execution Vulnerability in ingress-nginx Threatens Kubernetes Clusters

746After Incident
CRITICAL-5
KUB1770194009
Critical Code Execution Vulnerability in ingress-nginx Threatens Kubernetes Clusters A severe security flaw (CVE-2026-24512) has been identified in ingress-nginx, a widely used Kubernetes ingress controller, enabling authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code and access sensitive cluster secrets. The vulnerability stems from improper handling of the `rules.http.paths.path` field in Ingress resources, allowing malicious configuration injection into the underlying NGINX web server. Exploitation requires only low-level privileges and no user interaction, with the attack vector accessible remotely over a network. In default configurations, the ingress-nginx controller has permissions to read all Secrets across a Kubernetes cluster, amplifying the potential impact. Successful exploitation could grant attackers full control over affected systems. ### Affected Versions & Mitigation The vulnerability impacts: - ingress-nginx < v1.13.7 (fixed in v1.13.7+) - ingress-nginx < v1.14.3 (fixed in v1.14.3+) The Kubernetes Security Response Committee urges administrators to upgrade immediately to patched versions. For environments where upgrades are delayed, a validating admission controller can be deployed to block Ingress resources using the `ImplementationSpecific` path type as a temporary workaround. ### Detection & Response Organizations can check for vulnerable deployments using: ```sh kubectl get pods --all-namespaces --selector app.kubernetes.io/name=ingress-nginx ``` Signs of exploitation may include malformed data in `rules.http.paths.path` fields. If compromised, administrators should contact the Kubernetes security team at [email protected]. ### Long-Term Considerations The Kubernetes project has announced the end of maintenance for ingress-nginx, prompting organizations to evaluate alternative ingress solutions for sustained security.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Code Execution Vulnerability
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Sensitive cluster secretsSystems Affected: Kubernetes clusters using ingress-nginxOperational Impact: Full control over affected systems
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Cluster secretsSensitivity Of Data: High
JANUARY 2026
751Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
750Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
750Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
750Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
750Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
750Before Incident
JULY 2025
750Before Incident
JUNE 2025
752Before Incident
Vulnerability
16 Jun 2025Kubernetes
Kubernetes

Kubernetes NodeRestriction Controller Vulnerability

749After Incident
LOW-3
KUB527062525
A newly disclosed vulnerability in Kubernetes has been identified that could allow compromised nodes to bypass critical authorization checks within the container orchestration platform. The security flaw, tracked as CVE-2025-4563, affects the NodeRestriction admission controller and poses potential risks for organizations utilizing dynamic resource allocation features in their Kubernetes clusters. The vulnerability allows attackers to create unauthorized mirror pods, enabling privilege escalation attacks. Kubernetes versions 1.32.0-1.32.5 and 1.33.0-1.33.1 are vulnerable. Upgrade immediately to versions 1.32.6 or 1.33.2 to mitigate the risk.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vulnerability
MOTIVATION
Privilege Escalation
IMPACT
Systems Affected: Kubernetes clusters

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Kubernetes ?
?
What was Kubernetes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Kubernetes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Kubernetes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Kubernetes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Kubernetes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Kubernetes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Kubernetes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Kubernetes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Kubernetes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Kubernetes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was Kubernetes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Kubernetes's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Kubernetes ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Kubernetes's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?