Comparison Overview
KU Leuven ICTS

KU Leuven ICTS
Willem de Croylaan 52, Heverlee, Vlaams-Brabant, 3001, BE
Last Update: 14/02/2026
ICTS is the central computer department of KU Leuven. ICTS manages the central IT infrastructure, central databases, all servers (from mail servers to web servers) and the High Performance Cluster for scientific computing.

Softtek
Ave. Constitución 3098 Col. Santa María, 6th Floor, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, MX, 64650
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Founded in 1982 by a small group of entrepreneurs, Softtek started out in Mexico providing local IT services, and today is a global leader in next-generation digital solutions. The first company to introduce the Nearshore model, Softtek helps Global 2000 organizations b...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

KU Leuven ICTS







Softtek






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for KU Leuven ICTS in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Softtek in 2026.
Incident History - KU Leuven ICTS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
KU Leuven ICTS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Softtek (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Softtek cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

KU Leuven ICTS

Softtek
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.