Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KU Leuven ICTSKU Leuven ICTS
VS
eClerxeClerx
KU Leuven ICTS

KU Leuven ICTS

Willem de Croylaan 52, Heverlee, Vlaams-Brabant, 3001, BE

Last Update: 14/02/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.kuleuven.be/icts
748/1000Moderate

ICTS is the central computer department of KU Leuven. ICTS manages the central IT infrastructure, central databases, all servers (from mail servers to web servers) and the High Performance Cluster for scientific computing.

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:2
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
eClerx

eClerx

29 Bank Street, Fort, 1st Floor, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400 023

Last Update: 08/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eclerx.com
758/1000Fair

eClerx is a productized services company, bringing together people, technology and domain expertise to amplify business results. Our mission is to set the benchmark for client service and success in our industry. Our vision is to be the innovation partner of choice for ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:19,162
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KU Leuven ICTS

KU Leuven ICTS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
eClerx

eClerx

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KU Leuven ICTS in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for eClerx in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KU Leuven ICTS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KU Leuven ICTS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - eClerx (X = Date, Y = Severity)

eClerx cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KU Leuven ICTS

KU Leuven ICTS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
eClerx

eClerx

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between KU Leuven ICTS company and eClerx company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KU Leuven ICTS company and eClerx company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KU Leuven ICTS company and eClerx company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KU Leuven ICTS company and eClerx company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KU Leuven ICTS company and eClerx company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KU Leuven ICTS company and eClerx company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KU Leuven ICTS company and eClerx company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KU Leuven ICTS company and eClerx company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KU Leuven ICTS company and eClerx company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KU Leuven ICTS company and eClerx company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KU Leuven ICTS company and eClerx company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KU Leuven ICTS and eClerx, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KU Leuven ICTS and eClerx, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KU Leuven ICTS or eClerx ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KU Leuven ICTS or eClerx ?
Between KU Leuven ICTS and eClerx, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KU Leuven ICTS and eClerx, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9