Comparison Overview
KU Leuven ICTS

KU Leuven ICTS
Willem de Croylaan 52, Heverlee, Vlaams-Brabant, 3001, BE
Last Update: 14/02/2026
ICTS is the central computer department of KU Leuven. ICTS manages the central IT infrastructure, central databases, all servers (from mail servers to web servers) and the High Performance Cluster for scientific computing.

ASGN Incorporated
4400 Cox Road Suite 100, Glen Allen, Virginia, US, 23060
Last Update: 01/04/2026
ASGN Incorporated (NYSE: ASGN) is a leading provider of IT services and solutions across the commercial and government sectors. ASGN helps corporate enterprises and government organizations develop, implement and operate critical IT and business solutions through its in...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

KU Leuven ICTS







ASGN Incorporated






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for KU Leuven ICTS in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ASGN Incorporated in 2026.
Incident History - KU Leuven ICTS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
KU Leuven ICTS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - ASGN Incorporated (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ASGN Incorporated cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

KU Leuven ICTS

ASGN Incorporated
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.