Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KU School of Architecture & DesignKU School of Architecture & Design
VS
University of LouisvilleUniversity of Louisville
KU School of Architecture & Design

KU School of Architecture & Design

1465 Jayhawk Blvd., Lawrence, 66045, US

Last Update: 25/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://arcd.ku.edu
771/1000Fair

University of Kansas ArcD academic programs, studios, and research centers are driven to meet challenges through relentless creativity and solutions-based design. Undergraduate and graduate programs in Architecture, Animation, Design Management, Illustration, Industri...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
University of Louisville

University of Louisville

2301 S 3rd St, Louisville, ky, US, 40292-0001

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://louisville.edu
785/1000Fair

The University of Louisville is a state supported research university located in Kentucky's largest metropolitan area. It was a municipally supported public institution for many decades prior to joining the university system in 1970. The University has three campuses. T...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:10,362
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KU School of Architecture & Design

KU School of Architecture & Design

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of Louisville

University of Louisville

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KU School of Architecture & Design in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Louisville in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KU School of Architecture & Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KU School of Architecture & Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of Louisville (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Louisville cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KU School of Architecture & Design

KU School of Architecture & Design

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
University of Louisville

University of Louisville

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
UNI10592922

FAQ

Between KU School of Architecture & Design company and University of Louisville company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KU School of Architecture & Design company and University of Louisville company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KU School of Architecture & Design company and University of Louisville company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KU School of Architecture & Design company and University of Louisville company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KU School of Architecture & Design company and University of Louisville company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KU School of Architecture & Design company and University of Louisville company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KU School of Architecture & Design company and University of Louisville company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KU School of Architecture & Design company and University of Louisville company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KU School of Architecture & Design company and University of Louisville company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KU School of Architecture & Design company and University of Louisville company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KU School of Architecture & Design company and University of Louisville company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KU School of Architecture & Design and University of Louisville, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KU School of Architecture & Design and University of Louisville, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KU School of Architecture & Design or University of Louisville ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KU School of Architecture & Design or University of Louisville ?
Between KU School of Architecture & Design and University of Louisville, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KU School of Architecture & Design and University of Louisville, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1