Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KSB Norge ASKSB Norge AS
VS
WärtsiläWärtsilä
KSB Norge AS

KSB Norge AS

Holtbråtveien 69, Drøbak, 1449, NO

Last Update: 30/12/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.ksb.com/ksb-no/
744/1000Moderate

KSB Norge AS er en salgs- og serviceorganisasjon som er en del av KSB SE & Co. KGaA. Vi har levert pumper og ventiler for det norske markedet helt siden 1945 og med vår lange historie og kompetanse tilbyr vi våre kunder utmerket kundeservice og skreddersydde løsninger. ...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:35
Subsidiaries:36
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Wärtsilä

Wärtsilä

Hiililaiturinkuja 2, Helsinki, 00180, FI

Last Update: 23/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.wartsila.com
787/1000Fair

We are a global leader in innovative technologies and services shaping the decarbonisation of marine and energy. With approximately 6.9 billion euros in sales and 18,000 employees across 78 countries, the Wärtsilä strategy focuses on helping customers to continuously im...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:16,349
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KSB Norge AS

KSB Norge AS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Wärtsilä

Wärtsilä

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KSB Norge AS in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wärtsilä in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KSB Norge AS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KSB Norge AS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Wärtsilä (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wärtsilä cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KSB Norge AS

KSB Norge AS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Wärtsilä

Wärtsilä

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between KSB Norge AS company and Wärtsilä company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KSB Norge AS company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KSB Norge AS company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KSB Norge AS company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KSB Norge AS company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KSB Norge AS company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KSB Norge AS company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KSB Norge AS company and Wärtsilä company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KSB Norge AS company and Wärtsilä company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KSB Norge AS company and Wärtsilä company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KSB Norge AS company and Wärtsilä company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KSB Norge AS and Wärtsilä, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KSB Norge AS and Wärtsilä, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KSB Norge AS or Wärtsilä ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KSB Norge AS or Wärtsilä ?
Between KSB Norge AS and Wärtsilä, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KSB Norge AS and Wärtsilä, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA