Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KRM Construction Company LLCKRM Construction Company LLC
VS
Fluor CorporationFluor Corporation
KRM Construction Company LLC

KRM Construction Company LLC

205 Cannon Street, Chestertown, MD, 21620, US

Last Update: 24/12/2025

View Profile
751/1000Fair

KRM Construction Company, is a full service construction company based in Chestertown, Maryland serving the Eastern Shore of Maryland and Delaware. At KRM Construction, our business philosophy is composed of honesty, integrity and hard work. Our philosophy is not o...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:12
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Fluor Corporation

Fluor Corporation

6700 Las Colinas Blvd., Irving, 75039, US

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fluor.com
775/1000Fair

Fluor Corporation is a global engineering, procurement and construction company. We work with leaders in the energy, infrastructure, life sciences, advanced technologies, mining and metals industries, as well as government agencies, to build a better world. Since our f...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:36,351
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KRM Construction Company LLC

KRM Construction Company LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Fluor Corporation

Fluor Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KRM Construction Company LLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fluor Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KRM Construction Company LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KRM Construction Company LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Fluor Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fluor Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KRM Construction Company LLC

KRM Construction Company LLC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Fluor Corporation

Fluor Corporation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between KRM Construction Company LLC company and Fluor Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KRM Construction Company LLC company and Fluor Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KRM Construction Company LLC company and Fluor Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KRM Construction Company LLC company and Fluor Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KRM Construction Company LLC company and Fluor Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KRM Construction Company LLC company and Fluor Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KRM Construction Company LLC company and Fluor Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KRM Construction Company LLC company and Fluor Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KRM Construction Company LLC company and Fluor Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KRM Construction Company LLC company and Fluor Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KRM Construction Company LLC company and Fluor Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KRM Construction Company LLC and Fluor Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KRM Construction Company LLC and Fluor Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KRM Construction Company LLC or Fluor Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KRM Construction Company LLC or Fluor Corporation ?
Between KRM Construction Company LLC and Fluor Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KRM Construction Company LLC and Fluor Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9