Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kraft Sports + EntertainmentKraft Sports + Entertainment
VS
CinépolisCinépolis
Kraft Sports + Entertainment

Kraft Sports + Entertainment

One Patriot Place, Foxborough, Massachusetts, 02035, US

Last Update: 30/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.kraftse.com/
756/1000Fair

Kraft Sports + Entertainment, a division of The Kraft Group, oversees marketing, sales, content development, and event operations for the New England Patriots, the New England Revolution and Gillette Stadium. Led by Robert and Jonathan Kraft, Kraft Sports + Entertainmen...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:233
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Cinépolis

Cinépolis

Morelia , Michoacán , GT, 58254

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cinepolis.com
788/1000Fair

Leading global entertainment company born in Latin America, with over 6,000 screens, 3rd largest in the world. Cinépolis has operations in Mexico, Central and South America, Asia, Spain, India and United States of America. With more than 40k cinepolites delivering the "...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:14,849
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kraft Sports + Entertainment

Kraft Sports + Entertainment

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Cinépolis

Cinépolis

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Entertainment Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kraft Sports + Entertainment in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Entertainment Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cinépolis in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Kraft Sports + Entertainment (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kraft Sports + Entertainment cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Cinépolis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cinépolis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kraft Sports + Entertainment

Kraft Sports + Entertainment

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Cinépolis

Cinépolis

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Kraft Sports + Entertainment company and Cinépolis company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kraft Sports + Entertainment company and Cinépolis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kraft Sports + Entertainment company and Cinépolis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kraft Sports + Entertainment company and Cinépolis company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kraft Sports + Entertainment company and Cinépolis company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kraft Sports + Entertainment company and Cinépolis company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kraft Sports + Entertainment company and Cinépolis company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kraft Sports + Entertainment company and Cinépolis company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kraft Sports + Entertainment company and Cinépolis company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kraft Sports + Entertainment company and Cinépolis company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kraft Sports + Entertainment company and Cinépolis company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kraft Sports + Entertainment and Cinépolis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kraft Sports + Entertainment and Cinépolis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kraft Sports + Entertainment or Cinépolis ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kraft Sports + Entertainment or Cinépolis ?
Between Kraft Sports + Entertainment and Cinépolis, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kraft Sports + Entertainment and Cinépolis, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1