Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KRAFFT SLUKRAFFT SLU
VS
dsm-firmenichdsm-firmenich
KRAFFT SLU

KRAFFT SLU

Andoain, 20140, ES

Last Update: 27/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://krafft.auto/
752/1000Fair

Desde 1953, Krafft ofrece productos de alta calidad en los sectores de la automoción, la construcción y la industria. Más de 60 años después, seguimos demostrando que la garantía de calidad de nuestros productos. Todas las etapas de nuestros procesos de fabricación desd...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:78
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
dsm-firmenich

dsm-firmenich

N/A

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dsm-firmenich.com
792/1000Fair

We are dsm-firmenich – innovators in nutrition, health, and beauty. We bring progress to life by combining the essential, the desirable, and the sustainable. From our master perfumers and flavorists to our expert nutritionists and scientists, our trailblazing teams wo...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:27,774
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KRAFFT SLU

KRAFFT SLU

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
dsm-firmenich

dsm-firmenich

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KRAFFT SLU in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for dsm-firmenich in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KRAFFT SLU (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KRAFFT SLU cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - dsm-firmenich (X = Date, Y = Severity)

dsm-firmenich cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KRAFFT SLU

KRAFFT SLU

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
dsm-firmenich

dsm-firmenich

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between KRAFFT SLU company and dsm-firmenich company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KRAFFT SLU company and dsm-firmenich company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KRAFFT SLU company and dsm-firmenich company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KRAFFT SLU company and dsm-firmenich company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KRAFFT SLU company and dsm-firmenich company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KRAFFT SLU company and dsm-firmenich company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KRAFFT SLU company and dsm-firmenich company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KRAFFT SLU company and dsm-firmenich company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KRAFFT SLU company and dsm-firmenich company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KRAFFT SLU company and dsm-firmenich company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KRAFFT SLU company and dsm-firmenich company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KRAFFT SLU and dsm-firmenich, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KRAFFT SLU and dsm-firmenich, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KRAFFT SLU or dsm-firmenich ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KRAFFT SLU or dsm-firmenich ?
Between KRAFFT SLU and dsm-firmenich, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KRAFFT SLU and dsm-firmenich, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES