Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KPMG UkraineKPMG Ukraine
VS
BearingPointBearingPoint
KPMG Ukraine

KPMG Ukraine

Business center "Senator"​,, Kyiv, undefined, 01010, UA

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kpmg.ua
754/1000Fair

KPMG – це міжнародна мережа фірм, що надають аудиторські, податкові та консультаційні послуги. В офісах KPMG у 143 країнах світу працюють понад 273,000 співробітників (FY23). Кожна фірма KPMG є незалежною юридичною особою і представляє себе як таку. KPMG працює в Украї...

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:486
Subsidiaries:77
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
BearingPoint

BearingPoint

BearingPoint B.V., Amsterdam, NL-1101 BH, NL

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bearingpoint.com
766/1000Fair

BearingPoint is an independent management and technology consultancy. Our roots are European, but our footprint is truly global. Transformation is our core service. We deliver value to enterprises, government organizations and NGOs. In a rapidly changing world, Bearing...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:10,029
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KPMG Ukraine

KPMG Ukraine

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BearingPoint

BearingPoint

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPMG Ukraine in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BearingPoint in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KPMG Ukraine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPMG Ukraine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BearingPoint (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BearingPoint cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KPMG Ukraine

KPMG Ukraine

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
BearingPoint

BearingPoint

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between KPMG Ukraine company and BearingPoint company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KPMG Ukraine company and BearingPoint company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KPMG Ukraine company and BearingPoint company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KPMG Ukraine company and BearingPoint company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KPMG Ukraine company and BearingPoint company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KPMG Ukraine company and BearingPoint company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KPMG Ukraine company and BearingPoint company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KPMG Ukraine company and BearingPoint company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KPMG Ukraine company and BearingPoint company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KPMG Ukraine company and BearingPoint company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KPMG Ukraine company and BearingPoint company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KPMG Ukraine and BearingPoint, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KPMG Ukraine and BearingPoint, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KPMG Ukraine or BearingPoint ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KPMG Ukraine or BearingPoint ?
Between KPMG Ukraine and BearingPoint, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KPMG Ukraine and BearingPoint, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA