Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KPMG NorwayKPMG Norway
VS
GenpactGenpact
KPMG Norway

KPMG Norway

Dronning Eufemias gate 6A, Oslo, NO

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.kpmg.no
759/1000Fair

KPMG er mest kjent som revisorer, forretningskonsulenter og advokater, men vi er også mye mer. Vi vet hva virksomheter har på toppen av sin agenda, derfor har vi bygget ledende fagmiljøer innen områdene som blir viktigst i framtiden: cybersikkerhet, bærekraft, kompetan...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:1,707
Subsidiaries:73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Genpact

Genpact

1155, Avenue of the Americas, 4th Floor,, New York, NY, US, 10036

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.genpact.com
772/1000Fair

Genpact is an agentic and advanced technology solutions company. We leverage process intelligence and artificial intelligence to deliver measurable outcomes. With a strong partner ecosystem and decades of client trust, we provide innovative solutions that transform how ...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:139,117
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KPMG Norway

KPMG Norway

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Genpact

Genpact

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPMG Norway in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Genpact in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KPMG Norway (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPMG Norway cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Genpact (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Genpact cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KPMG Norway

KPMG Norway

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Genpact

Genpact

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between KPMG Norway company and Genpact company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KPMG Norway company and Genpact company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KPMG Norway company and Genpact company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KPMG Norway company and Genpact company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KPMG Norway company and Genpact company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KPMG Norway company and Genpact company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KPMG Norway company and Genpact company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KPMG Norway company and Genpact company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KPMG Norway company and Genpact company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KPMG Norway company and Genpact company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KPMG Norway company and Genpact company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KPMG Norway and Genpact, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KPMG Norway and Genpact, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KPMG Norway or Genpact ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KPMG Norway or Genpact ?
Between KPMG Norway and Genpact, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KPMG Norway and Genpact, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9