Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KPMG Türkiye KariyerKPMG Türkiye Kariyer
VS
ELISELIS
KPMG Türkiye Kariyer

KPMG Türkiye Kariyer

İş Kuleleri, Kule 3, Kat:2-9 Levent, İstanbul, 34330, TR

Last Update: 27/02/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

KPMG Türkiye, lokal ve uluslararası tüm müşterilerinin ihtiyaçlarına cevap vermek adına geleneksel denetim ve uygunluk denetimi anlayışını genişleterek, firmaya ve endüstriye özel hizmetler sağlayan profesyonel bir denetim, vergi ve danışmanlık şirketidir. 1982 yılında ...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ELIS

ELIS

18, Rue Hoche, Puteaux, 92800, FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.elis.com
772/1000Fair

As the leader in circular services at work, Elis ensures its clients achieve optimal hygiene, well-being and protection – everywhere, every day, in a sustainable way. We employ 54,000 people locally in 30 countries. We work for public and private organizations of all s...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:14,064
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KPMG Türkiye Kariyer

KPMG Türkiye Kariyer

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ELIS

ELIS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPMG Türkiye Kariyer in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ELIS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KPMG Türkiye Kariyer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPMG Türkiye Kariyer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ELIS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ELIS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KPMG Türkiye Kariyer

KPMG Türkiye Kariyer

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ELIS

ELIS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between KPMG Türkiye Kariyer company and ELIS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KPMG Türkiye Kariyer company and ELIS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KPMG Türkiye Kariyer company and ELIS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KPMG Türkiye Kariyer company and ELIS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KPMG Türkiye Kariyer company and ELIS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KPMG Türkiye Kariyer company and ELIS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KPMG Türkiye Kariyer company and ELIS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KPMG Türkiye Kariyer company and ELIS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KPMG Türkiye Kariyer company and ELIS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KPMG Türkiye Kariyer company and ELIS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KPMG Türkiye Kariyer company and ELIS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KPMG Türkiye Kariyer and ELIS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KPMG Türkiye Kariyer and ELIS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KPMG Türkiye Kariyer or ELIS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KPMG Türkiye Kariyer or ELIS ?
Between KPMG Türkiye Kariyer and ELIS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KPMG Türkiye Kariyer and ELIS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2