Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KPMGジャパン/KPMG JapanKPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan
VS
ZSZS
KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

大手町1丁目9番7号, 千代田区, 東京都, 100-0004, JP

Last Update: 26/12/2025

View Profile
757/1000Fair

KPMGジャパンは、KPMGインターナショナルの日本におけるメンバーファームの総称であり、監査、税務、アドバイザリーの3つの分野にわたる7つのプロフェッショナルファームによって構成されています。 KPMGジャパンのメンバーファーム: 各分野のプロフェッショナルが専門的知識やスキルを活かして連携し、KPMGのグローバルネットワークも活用しながらサービスを提供しています。 ・あずさ監査法人 ・KPMG税理士法人 ・KPMGコンサルティング ・KPMG FAS ・KPMGあずさサステナビリティ ・KPMGヘルスケアジャパン ・KPMG社...

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:1,415
Subsidiaries:73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ZS

ZS

1560 Sherman Avenue, Evanston, IL, US, 60201

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.zs.com
791/1000Fair

ZS is a management consulting and technology firm that partners with companies to improve life and how we live it. We transform ideas into impact by bringing together data, science, technology and human ingenuity to deliver better outcomes for all. Founded in 1983, ZS h...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:20,818
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ZS

ZS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ZS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ZS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ZS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ZS

ZS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and ZS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and ZS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and ZS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and ZS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and ZS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and ZS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and ZS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and ZS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and ZS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and ZS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and ZS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan and ZS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan and ZS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan or ZS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan or ZS ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan and ZS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan and ZS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3