Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KPMGジャパン/KPMG JapanKPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan
VS
McKinsey & CompanyMcKinsey & Company
KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

大手町1丁目9番7号, 千代田区, 東京都, 100-0004, JP

Last Update: 26/12/2025

View Profile
757/1000Fair

KPMGジャパンは、KPMGインターナショナルの日本におけるメンバーファームの総称であり、監査、税務、アドバイザリーの3つの分野にわたる7つのプロフェッショナルファームによって構成されています。 KPMGジャパンのメンバーファーム: 各分野のプロフェッショナルが専門的知識やスキルを活かして連携し、KPMGのグローバルネットワークも活用しながらサービスを提供しています。 ・あずさ監査法人 ・KPMG税理士法人 ・KPMGコンサルティング ・KPMG FAS ・KPMGあずさサステナビリティ ・KPMGヘルスケアジャパン ・KPMG社...

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:1,415
Subsidiaries:73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
McKinsey & Company

McKinsey & Company

US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.mckinsey.com
815/1000Good

McKinsey & Company is a global management consulting firm. We are the trusted advisor to the world's leading businesses, governments, and institutions. We work with leading organizations across the private, public and social sectors. Our scale, scope, and knowledge ...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:38,633
Subsidiaries:44
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
McKinsey & Company

McKinsey & Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

McKinsey & Company has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - McKinsey & Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McKinsey & Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
McKinsey & Company

McKinsey & Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MCK1773109656

FAQ

Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and McKinsey & Company company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and McKinsey & Company company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan and McKinsey & Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan and McKinsey & Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan or McKinsey & Company ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan or McKinsey & Company ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan and McKinsey & Company, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan and McKinsey & Company, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA