Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KPMGジャパン/KPMG JapanKPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan
VS
GenpactGenpact
KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

大手町1丁目9番7号, 千代田区, 東京都, 100-0004, JP

Last Update: 26/12/2025

View Profile
757/1000Fair

KPMGジャパンは、KPMGインターナショナルの日本におけるメンバーファームの総称であり、監査、税務、アドバイザリーの3つの分野にわたる7つのプロフェッショナルファームによって構成されています。 KPMGジャパンのメンバーファーム: 各分野のプロフェッショナルが専門的知識やスキルを活かして連携し、KPMGのグローバルネットワークも活用しながらサービスを提供しています。 ・あずさ監査法人 ・KPMG税理士法人 ・KPMGコンサルティング ・KPMG FAS ・KPMGあずさサステナビリティ ・KPMGヘルスケアジャパン ・KPMG社...

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:1,415
Subsidiaries:73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Genpact

Genpact

1155, Avenue of the Americas, 4th Floor,, New York, NY, US, 10036

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.genpact.com
772/1000Fair

Genpact is an agentic and advanced technology solutions company. We leverage process intelligence and artificial intelligence to deliver measurable outcomes. With a strong partner ecosystem and decades of client trust, we provide innovative solutions that transform how ...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:139,117
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Genpact

Genpact

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Genpact in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Genpact (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Genpact cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Genpact

Genpact

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and Genpact company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and Genpact company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and Genpact company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and Genpact company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and Genpact company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and Genpact company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and Genpact company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and Genpact company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and Genpact company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and Genpact company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and Genpact company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan and Genpact, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan and Genpact, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan or Genpact ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan or Genpact ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan and Genpact, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan and Genpact, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67595
SUMMARY

VaahCMS versions 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 contain a malicious obfuscated JavaScript payload embedded in the Blade template responsible for rendering security OTP emails, allowing remote attackers to execute unauthorized code in any browser that renders the affected email template with JavaScript enabled. The payload establishes a WebSocket connection to a hardcoded command-and-control endpoint, installs a password-field keylogger using MutationObserver to capture dynamically added inputs, scrapes WhatsApp Web DOM content, and accepts remote commands to redirect or overwrite the rendered page.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-15157
SUMMARY

undici does not validate the type property of a duck-typed blob-like request body before using it as the Content-Type header on the HTTP/1.1 dispatcher. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, an application that passes a hand-rolled blob-like body (via request, stream, pipeline, or dispatch) whose type is derived from untrusted input allows an attacker to inject CRLF sequences and append arbitrary HTTP headers, potentially smuggling a second request past the upstream. Native Blob objects are safe because their constructor strips CRLF from the type, and fetch is unaffected because it validates headers, but ecosystem libraries that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input can reach the vulnerable path. This is the same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 and CVE-2026-1527, on a header sink that the earlier fixes did not cover. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-14643
SUMMARY

undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace placed around the equals sign of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive. In undici from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, the parser either drops the directive or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the cache decision fails to recognize the qualification and the response is stored. In shared-cache mode, this lets a response containing one user's authenticated data be served from cache to a later caller, including an unauthenticated one, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. It affects applications that enable the cache interceptor in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified directives padded with whitespace around the equals sign. This is the whitespace-around-equals variant that the fix for CVE-2026-9678 did not normalize, and it is fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-69945
SUMMARY

kishan0725 Hospital Management System 4.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /doctor/edit-patient.php?editid=1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA