Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KPMGジャパン/KPMG JapanKPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan
VS
DevoteamDevoteam
KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

大手町1丁目9番7号, 千代田区, 東京都, 100-0004, JP

Last Update: 26/12/2025

View Profile
757/1000Fair

KPMGジャパンは、KPMGインターナショナルの日本におけるメンバーファームの総称であり、監査、税務、アドバイザリーの3つの分野にわたる7つのプロフェッショナルファームによって構成されています。 KPMGジャパンのメンバーファーム: 各分野のプロフェッショナルが専門的知識やスキルを活かして連携し、KPMGのグローバルネットワークも活用しながらサービスを提供しています。 ・あずさ監査法人 ・KPMG税理士法人 ・KPMGコンサルティング ・KPMG FAS ・KPMGあずさサステナビリティ ・KPMGヘルスケアジャパン ・KPMG社...

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:1,415
Subsidiaries:73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Devoteam

Devoteam

73, rue Anatole France, Levallois-Perret, 92300, FR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.devoteam.com
789/1000Fair

Devoteam is a AI-driven tech consulting firm specialised in cloud platforms, cyber, data, and sustainability. Tech native for almost 30 years, Devoteam guides businesses through sustainable digital transformation to deliver value. With over 11,000 tech architects in ...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:10,286
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Devoteam

Devoteam

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Devoteam in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Devoteam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Devoteam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Devoteam

Devoteam

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and Devoteam company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and Devoteam company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and Devoteam company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and Devoteam company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and Devoteam company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and Devoteam company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and Devoteam company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and Devoteam company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and Devoteam company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and Devoteam company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan company and Devoteam company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan and Devoteam, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan and Devoteam, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan or Devoteam ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan or Devoteam ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan and Devoteam, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KPMGジャパン/KPMG Japan and Devoteam, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9044
SUMMARY

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the VPN module of TP-Link AXE75 V1 routers. This vulnerability allows an adjacent, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device by importing a specially crafted VPN client configuration file. The issue arises from improper filtering of special characters.  Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may enable an attacker to gain full control of the affected device, potentially compromising configuration integrity, network security, and service availability.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-54909
SUMMARY

pion/stun is a Go implementation of STUN. Prior to 3.1.3, XORMappedAddress.GetFromAs can panic while parsing a malformed short XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS attribute in STUN or ICE Binding-response parsing paths, allowing remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54785
SUMMARY

gemini-bridge is a lightweight MCP server bridging AI agents to Google's Gemini AI via the official CLI. From 1.0.0 until 1.3.1, consult_gemini_with_files in inline mode read any file path supplied in the files argument without confining it to the working directory, then forwarded the contents to the Gemini CLI. Because the caller also controls query, the file contents are echoed back through the Gemini round-trip (and sent to Google), making this an arbitrary local file read. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-54768
SUMMARY

WPGraphQL provides a GraphQL API for WordPress sites. From 2.0.0 until 2.15.1, the deprecated user field on SendPasswordResetEmailPayload lets an unauthenticated caller distinguish existing author-class accounts through the sendPasswordResetEmail mutation and obtain public profile fields. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53573
SUMMARY

GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. From 3.12.0 until 4.2.16 and 4.4.11, unsafe redirect validation in GeonetworkOAuth2LoginAuthenticationFilter and KeycloakAuthenticationProcessingFilter permits an attacker-controlled external redirect after login. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.16 and 4.4.11.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA