Comparison Overview
KPMG Bulgaria

KPMG Bulgaria
45/A Bulgaria Boulevard, Sofia, undefined, 1404, BG
Last Update: 09/03/2026
KPMG is a global organization of independent professional services firms providing Audit, Tax and Advisory services. We operate in 143 countries and territories and in FY20 had close to 227,000 people working in member firms around the world. Each KPMG firm is a legally...

Westpac Group
275 Kent St, Sydney, 2000, AU
Last Update: 05/09/2026
From rescue helicopters to signing the Equator Principles, from paying super during parental leave to adding 'Touch ID' biometric technology to our banking apps and being first on the scene with a helping hand in times of crisis... we have a proud history of stepping u...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

KPMG Bulgaria







Westpac Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for KPMG Bulgaria in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Westpac Group has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - KPMG Bulgaria (X = Date, Y = Severity)
KPMG Bulgaria cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Westpac Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Westpac Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

KPMG Bulgaria

Westpac Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.