Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KPMG BelgiumKPMG Belgium
VS
Applus+Applus+
KPMG Belgium

KPMG Belgium

Luchthaven Brussel Nationaal 1K, Zaventem, 1930, BE

Last Update: 26/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.kpmg.com/be
761/1000Fair

Uncovering a world of opportunity together. Whether your objective is to speed up digitalization, manage risk, drive growth, optimize cost, or increase your competitive advantage to secure your organization’s future, we can help you uncover fresh insights and develop n...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:1,851
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Applus+

Applus+

C/Campezo 1, Edificio 3, Madrid, 28022, ES

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.applus.com
781/1000Fair

Applus+ is a worldwide leader in the testing, inspection, and certification sector. We are a trusted partner, enhancing the quality and safety of our clients’ assets and infrastructures while safeguarding their operations and improving their environmental performance. O...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:19,384
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KPMG Belgium

KPMG Belgium

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Applus+

Applus+

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPMG Belgium in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Applus+ in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KPMG Belgium (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPMG Belgium cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Applus+ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Applus+ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KPMG Belgium

KPMG Belgium

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Applus+

Applus+

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between KPMG Belgium company and Applus+ company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KPMG Belgium company and Applus+ company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KPMG Belgium company and Applus+ company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KPMG Belgium company and Applus+ company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KPMG Belgium company and Applus+ company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KPMG Belgium company and Applus+ company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KPMG Belgium company and Applus+ company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KPMG Belgium company and Applus+ company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KPMG Belgium company and Applus+ company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KPMG Belgium company and Applus+ company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KPMG Belgium company and Applus+ company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KPMG Belgium and Applus+, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KPMG Belgium and Applus+, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KPMG Belgium or Applus+ ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KPMG Belgium or Applus+ ?
Between KPMG Belgium and Applus+, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KPMG Belgium and Applus+, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA