Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kplus AlumniKplus Alumni
VS
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Kplus Alumni

Kplus Alumni

N/A

Last Update: 11/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.kplusgruppe.de/
768/1000Fair

Private Seite für ehemalige Mitarbeitenden der Kplus Gruppe.

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

1275 York Avenue, New York, 10065, US

Last Update: 29/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.mskcc.org
671/1000Weak

The people of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) are united by a singular mission: ending cancer for life. Our specialized care teams provide personalized, compassionate, expert care to patients of all ages. Informed by basic research done at our Sloan Ketteri...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:19,500
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kplus Alumni

Kplus Alumni

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kplus Alumni in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Kplus Alumni (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kplus Alumni cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kplus Alumni

Kplus Alumni

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MEM1777422356

FAQ

Between Kplus Alumni company and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kplus Alumni company and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kplus Alumni company and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kplus Alumni company and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kplus Alumni company and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kplus Alumni company and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kplus Alumni company and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kplus Alumni company and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kplus Alumni company and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kplus Alumni company and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kplus Alumni company and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kplus Alumni and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kplus Alumni and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kplus Alumni or Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kplus Alumni or Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center ?
Between Kplus Alumni and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kplus Alumni and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-80138
SUMMARY

ClipBucket V5's web installer fails to properly validate or escape the php_cli_filepath parameter before passing it to shell execution. Unauthenticated attackers can submit a crafted POST request to the installer with a malicious php_cli_filepath value to execute arbitrary commands as the web server user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-79912
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in TOTOLINK N600R 4.3.0cu.7647_B20210106. The impacted element is the function getCurrentTime of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Performing a manipulation of the argument ntp_server results in command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-79911
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in TOTOLINK N600R 4.3.0cu.7647_B20210106. The affected element is the function setSystemConfig of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. Such manipulation of the argument Hostname leads to stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS2
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-70665
SUMMARY

Doorkeeper OpenID Connect implements an OpenID Connect authentication provider for Rails applications on top of Doorkeeper. Prior to 1.10.4, the Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) endpoint persists client-supplied scopes without validating them against the server's configured scope set. Under certain conditions, this allows a self-registered client to obtain scopes beyond what the server intended to grant. In DynamicClientRegistrationController#application_params, the scopes attribute is assigned directly from params[:scope] with no validation against Doorkeeper.configuration.scopes or optional_scopes. Combined with enforce_configured_scopes being off by default and Doorkeeper's ScopeChecker prioritizing application-level scopes over server-level scopes, this creates a privilege escalation path. This issue is fixed in version 1.10.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-55805
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Drupal core allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Drupal core versions: from 0.0.0 to 10.6.13, from 11.3.0 to 11.3.14, from 11.4.0 to 11.4.4, from 0.0.0 to 11.0.*, from 0.0.0 to 11.1.*, from 0.0.0 to 11.2.*.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA