Comparison Overview

Korn Ferry

VS

Capgemini Invent

Korn Ferry

1900 Avenue of The Stars, Suite 2600, Los Angeles, CA, US, 90067
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Korn Ferry is a global consulting firm that powers performance. We unlock the potential in your people and unleash transformation across your business—synchronizing strategy, operations, and talent to accelerate performance, fuel growth, and inspire a legacy of change. That’s why the world’s most forward-thinking companies across every major industry turn to us—for a shared commitment to lasting impact and the bold ambition to Be More Than.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 18,756
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Capgemini Invent

Place de l'Etoile, 11 rue de Tilsitt, Paris, undefined, 75017, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Capgemini Invent is the digital innovation, consulting and transformation brand of the Capgemini Group, a global business line that combines market leading expertise in strategy, technology, data science and creative design, to help CxOs envision and build what’s next for their businesses. For more information: http://www.capgemini.com/invent. Follow us on Twitter @CapgeminiInvent.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 16,459
Subsidiaries: 37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kornferry.jpeg
Korn Ferry
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capgemini-invent.jpeg
Capgemini Invent
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Korn Ferry
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Capgemini Invent
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Korn Ferry in 2025.

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capgemini Invent in 2025.

Incident History — Korn Ferry (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Korn Ferry cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Capgemini Invent (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capgemini Invent cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kornferry.jpeg
Korn Ferry
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2012
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capgemini-invent.jpeg
Capgemini Invent
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Capgemini Invent company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Korn Ferry company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Korn Ferry company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Capgemini Invent company has not reported any.

In the current year, Capgemini Invent company and Korn Ferry company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Capgemini Invent company nor Korn Ferry company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Korn Ferry company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Capgemini Invent company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Capgemini Invent company nor Korn Ferry company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Korn Ferry company nor Capgemini Invent company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Korn Ferry nor Capgemini Invent holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Capgemini Invent company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Korn Ferry company.

Korn Ferry company employs more people globally than Capgemini Invent company, reflecting its scale as a Business Consulting and Services.

Neither Korn Ferry nor Capgemini Invent holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Korn Ferry nor Capgemini Invent holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Korn Ferry nor Capgemini Invent holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Korn Ferry nor Capgemini Invent holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Korn Ferry nor Capgemini Invent holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Korn Ferry nor Capgemini Invent holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N