Comparison Overview
Korian Belgium

Korian Belgium
Satenrozen 1B, Kontich, België 2550, BE
Last Update: 21/04/2026
Werken bij Korian betekent veel meer dan werken in de zorg. Bij Korian draag je dagelijks je steentje bij aan het welbevinden en de levenskwaliteit van ouderen en kwetsbare mensen, waar je ook werkt: in één van onze woonzorgcentra, in de thuiszorg, of op het hoofdkantoo...

Queensland Health
33 Charlotte Street, Brisbane, 4000, AU
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Queensland Health is the state's largest healthcare provider. We are committed to ensuring all Queenslanders have access to a range of public healthcare services aimed at achieving good health and well-being. Through a network of 16 Hospital and Health Services, as wel...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Korian Belgium







Queensland Health






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Korian Belgium in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Queensland Health in 2026.
Incident History - Korian Belgium (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Korian Belgium cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Queensland Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Queensland Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Korian Belgium

Queensland Health
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.