Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KonteraKontera
VS
SwiggySwiggy
Kontera

Kontera

950 Tower Lane Ste 2000, Foster City, California, US, 94404

Last Update: 22/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.amobee.com
696/1000Weak

Amobee, the company defining digital marketing, brings marketers, agencies, publishers and operators an innovative digital marketing technology platform and solutions. The Amobee technology platform enables advertisers to run data-driven, targeted, cross channel digi...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:49
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Swiggy

Swiggy

Bengaluru, Karnataka, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://careers.swiggy.com
790/1000Fair

Swiggy is India’s pioneering on-demand convenience platform, catering to millions of consumers each month. Founded in 2014, its mission is to elevate the quality of life for the urban consumer by offering unparalleled convenience. With an extensive footprint in food del...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:26,451
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kontera

Kontera

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Swiggy

Swiggy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

Kontera has 39.76% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swiggy in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Kontera (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kontera cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Swiggy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swiggy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kontera

Kontera

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GOOBLOKONBIG1770906371
Swiggy

Swiggy

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Kontera company and Swiggy company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kontera company and Swiggy company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kontera company and Swiggy company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kontera company and Swiggy company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kontera company and Swiggy company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kontera company and Swiggy company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kontera company and Swiggy company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kontera company and Swiggy company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kontera company and Swiggy company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kontera company and Swiggy company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kontera company and Swiggy company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kontera and Swiggy, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kontera and Swiggy, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kontera or Swiggy ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kontera or Swiggy ?
Between Kontera and Swiggy, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kontera and Swiggy, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57990
SUMMARY

Files or directories accessible to external parties in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57989
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57978
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-17497
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 grants the Tauri shell plugin shell:allow-execute capability for bash, python, and python3 with arbitrary arguments in the default desktop capabilities. JavaScript running in the application webview can therefore invoke plugin:shell|execute to run attacker-controlled operating system commands with the privileges of the NoteGen process. In combination with script execution in the webview (for example via chat XSS), this enables full remote code execution on the user's machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-17496
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 renders AI chat responses with markdown-it configured with html:true and injects the result into the DOM via dangerouslySetInnerHTML in chat-preview, without HTML sanitization and with CSP set to null. Attacker-controlled content that reaches the model prompt (for example a malicious skill REFERENCE.md that instructs the model to emit HTML) can cause the model response to include executable markup such as an img onerror handler. When the user views the chat response, that markup runs as JavaScript in the privileged Tauri webview, enabling arbitrary script execution in the application context (cross-site scripting).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8