Comparison Overview
Koning & Hartman

Koning & Hartman
Voltastraat 4, Zwijndrecht, Zuid-Holland, 3335 KK, NL
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Technologie speelt een sleutelrol in onze samenleving. Digitalisering leidt tot een hyper-connected wereld waarin technologie leidend is in alle facetten van de samenleving. De oplossingen van Koning & Hartman zijn een combinatie van producten, systemen en diensten, w...

Akamai Technologies
8 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA, US, 02142
Last Update: 28/04/2026
At Akamai, we make life better for billions of people, billions of times a day. Every day, billions of people around the world connect with their favorite brands to shop online, play the latest video games, log into mobile banking apps, learn remotely, share videos wi...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Koning & Hartman







Akamai Technologies






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Koning & Hartman in 2026.
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
Akamai Technologies has 92.31% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Koning & Hartman (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Koning & Hartman cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Akamai Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Akamai Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Koning & Hartman

Akamai Technologies
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.
Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.