Comparison Overview
Konecta Foundation

Konecta Foundation
Calle de Albacete, 5, Madrid, 28027, ES
Last Update: 26/02/2026
Konecta created Konecta Foundation in 2005, channeling its strengths and resources to support global social action and inclusion with long-lasting positive impacts.

British Council
1 Redman Place, Stratford, London, England, GB, SW1A 2BN
Last Update: 02/04/2026
We support peace and prosperity by building connections, understanding and trust between people in the UK and countries worldwide. We uniquely combine the UK’s deep expertise in arts and culture, education and the English language, our global presence and relationships...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Konecta Foundation







British Council






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Konecta Foundation in 2026.
Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for British Council in 2026.
Incident History - Konecta Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Konecta Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - British Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)
British Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Konecta Foundation

British Council
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.