Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KondorWessels VastgoedKondorWessels Vastgoed
VS
SavillsSavills
KondorWessels Vastgoed

KondorWessels Vastgoed

De Cuserstraat 93, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, 1081, NL

Last Update: 23/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kondorwessels.nl
751/1000Fair

KondorWessels Vastgoed is een veelzijdige onderneming, die zich net als haar moeder, VolkerWessels, bezig houdt met de samenleving waarin mensen centraal staan. Anders dan onze naam doet vermoeden zijn wij geen traditioneel vastgoedbedrijf. Als projectontwikkelaar reali...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:2
Subsidiaries:73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Savills

Savills

33 Margaret Street, London, GB, W1G 0JD

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.savills.com
760/1000Fair

Savills is a global real estate advisor helping people thrive through places and spaces. With over 42,000 professionals in more than 700 offices across the Americas, Europe, Asia Pacific, Africa and the Middle East, we combine local knowledge with global insight to del...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:13,748
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KondorWessels Vastgoed

KondorWessels Vastgoed

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Savills

Savills

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KondorWessels Vastgoed in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Savills in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KondorWessels Vastgoed (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KondorWessels Vastgoed cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Savills (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Savills cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KondorWessels Vastgoed

KondorWessels Vastgoed

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Savills

Savills

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between KondorWessels Vastgoed company and Savills company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KondorWessels Vastgoed company and Savills company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KondorWessels Vastgoed company and Savills company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KondorWessels Vastgoed company and Savills company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KondorWessels Vastgoed company and Savills company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KondorWessels Vastgoed company and Savills company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KondorWessels Vastgoed company and Savills company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KondorWessels Vastgoed company and Savills company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KondorWessels Vastgoed company and Savills company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KondorWessels Vastgoed company and Savills company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KondorWessels Vastgoed company and Savills company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KondorWessels Vastgoed and Savills, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KondorWessels Vastgoed and Savills, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KondorWessels Vastgoed or Savills ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KondorWessels Vastgoed or Savills ?
Between KondorWessels Vastgoed and Savills, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KondorWessels Vastgoed and Savills, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2